On Sun, 21 Dec 2014 20:23:17 -0600 Brad Bosch brad112...@gmail.com wrote:
I've not chimed in on this yet because I haven't had much time to research
the history or use of libuser (and I still haven't, really).
But I'd like to point out...
The id-utils package has been part of Debian for
On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 1:32 PM, Michael Gilbert wrote:
Here is a proposal, rename lid in id-utils to qid. Here is the logic:
Also, no other package provides a qid binary in any of the bin dirs.
Best wishes,
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
Because that's not what policy says Conflicts is for. If typing 'lid'
runs an entirely different command depending on the phase of the moon,
we've done something wrong, and we should fix it. It's quite possible
the least disruptive
I've not chimed in on this yet because I haven't had much time to research
the history or use of libuser (and I still haven't, really).
But I'd like to point out...
The id-utils package has been part of Debian for almost as long as Debian
existed. It is a rather old official GNU package (for
Hi all,
Am 10.12.2014 um 17:39 schrieb Julien Cristau:
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 13:41:13 +0100, Micha Lenk wrote:
Julien, could you please elaborate why we can't have the 'lid'
command be shipped both by libuser and id-utils (as you stated in
748728#34) *even if* a Conflicts: dependency
Control: tags 772679 - wontfix
Control: reopen 772679
Hi Ivo,
Am 10.12.2014 um 10:40 schrieb Ivo De Decker:
+ * Add Conflict: id-utils to libuser (closes: #748728).
It was clearly mentioned in
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=748728#34 that this change
is not acceptable.
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 13:41:13 +0100, Micha Lenk wrote:
Control: tags 772679 - wontfix
Control: reopen 772679
Hi Ivo,
Am 10.12.2014 um 10:40 schrieb Ivo De Decker:
+ * Add Conflict: id-utils to libuser (closes: #748728).
It was clearly mentioned in
7 matches
Mail list logo
