On 08.11.2014 21:35, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> BTW, isn't doing that in the postrm too late anyway? Shouldn't that be
> removed already by "prerm remove"? With the postrm approach there is a
> small timespan where sudo could fail: the libsss library is already
> removed, but still referenced in /et
On 21.11.2014 13:47, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 2014-11-21 07:09, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
>> So I guess it would make sense for base-files to add "sudoers: files" to
>> the default nsswitch.conf?
>
> Yes. Could you file a bug, please?
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=770825
> PS:
On 08.11.2014 21:35, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>> Strange, purge works for me..
>
> This probably depends on how /etc/nsswitch.conf looked before the test,
> i.e. whether it already contained a sudoers line.
>
>> :: root@sid:/etc> md5sum nsswitch.conf
>> d204d419661fba0df52f9be8e2a29fdd nsswitch.c
On 29.05.2014 15:59, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Package: libsss-sudo
> Version: 1.11.3-1
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: piuparts piuparts.d.o
>
> Hi,
>
> during a test with piuparts I noticed your package leaves a modified
> /etc/nsswitch.conf after purge.
>
> From the attached lo
4 matches
Mail list logo
