Control: forwarded -1 https://ogre3d.atlassian.net/browse/OGRE-420
2014-06-13 6:21 GMT+01:00 Scott Howard showard...@gmail.com:
block 744171 by 749944
thanks
On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
manuel.montez...@gmail.com wrote: I don't know if I mention this to
block 744171 by 749944
thanks
On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
manuel.montez...@gmail.com wrote: I don't know if I mention this to
them in the past. It happened in a
time when development was not very active and the old leader had to
retire for some reason, I
2014-05-31 16:30 GMT+01:00 Scott Howard showard...@gmail.com:
Thanks for all the info, sorry to make you spend time rehashing this!
For my own sanity, I'll try to summarize the technical problem:
It looks like the troublesome functions are defined in headers [1], so
ogre gets the definitions
2014-05-31 2:06 GMT+01:00 Scott Howard showard...@gmail.com:
reopen 749944
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 7:50 PM, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
manuel.montez...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-05-31 0:18 GMT+01:00 Scott Howard showard...@gmail.com:
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Manuel A. Fernandez
Thanks for all the info, sorry to make you spend time rehashing this!
For my own sanity, I'll try to summarize the technical problem:
It looks like the troublesome functions are defined in headers [1], so
ogre gets the definitions hardcoded if it pulls in the headers. Those
functions are now
Source: ogre-1.9
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
Ogre-1.9 builds against boost 1.54. Debian just bumped boost-defaults to 1.55.
Is it possible to bump debian/control BDs such that it builds against
libboost-dev instead of libboost1.54-dev?
It will make future transitions easier. Thank you.
2014-05-30 20:39 GMT+01:00 Scott Howard showard...@gmail.com:
Source: ogre-1.9
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
Ogre-1.9 builds against boost 1.54. Debian just bumped boost-defaults to 1.55.
Is it possible to bump debian/control BDs such that it builds against
libboost-dev instead of
2014-05-31 0:18 GMT+01:00 Scott Howard showard...@gmail.com:
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
manuel.montez...@gmail.com wrote:
The versions are hardcoded to force reverse build-depends using the
same versions, due to problems in the past (incompatibilities
reopen 749944
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 7:50 PM, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
manuel.montez...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-05-31 0:18 GMT+01:00 Scott Howard showard...@gmail.com:
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
manuel.montez...@gmail.com wrote:
The versions are
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 9:06 PM, Scott Howard showard...@gmail.com wrote:
You can reduce the effects of that breakage by
build-depending on libboost-dev, thus forcing those users to also
upgrade their code/compilation to the new versions of boost as well.
typo: you can reduce the effects of
10 matches
Mail list logo
