On Wednesday 11 June 2014 22:01:05 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> Doko has raised the severities to serius of the bugs in the qt5 stack
> that causes FTBFSs due to symbols changes. Should I start rebuilding or do
> you want to force the transition by ignoring the relevant bugs?
Just
Doko has raised the severities to serius of the bugs in the qt5 stack
that causes FTBFSs due to symbols changes. Should I start rebuilding or do
you want to force the transition by ignoring the relevant bugs?
--
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
http://perezmeyer.com.ar/
http://perezmeyer.blogs
gammaray and pyqt5 have built everywhere except sparc and hurd, so it should
be ready. fcitx-qt5 seems ready.
qtcreator is not a blocker.
We can wait for packages to age or age them, but that's your call :)
Thanks a lot! :-D
--
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
http://perezmeyer.com.ar/
ht
On 10/06/14 14:50, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> On Monday 09 June 2014 19:10:48 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> [snip]
>> For gammaray we need to wait a little longer.
>
> We can binNMU gammaray with dep wait for
>
> qttools-opensource-src >= 5.3.0
> qtdeclarative-op
On Monday 09 June 2014 19:10:48 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
[snip]
> For gammaray we need to wait a little longer.
We can binNMU gammaray with dep wait for
qttools-opensource-src >= 5.3.0
qtdeclarative-opensource-src >= 5.3.0
Thanks Julien for reminding me of this possibility!
-
On Tuesday 10 June 2014 13:11:40 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
[snip]
> Looks like some packages now get built from other sources, e.g.
> qml-module-qtquick-dialogs was built from qtdeclarative-opensource-src but
> now is built by qtquickcontrols-opensource-src. So we should be fine, and
> binnmus
On 10/06/14 06:58, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2014-06-10 00:37, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 10/06/14 00:24, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> On 10/06/14 00:10, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
fcitx-qt5 can be binNMUed on all archs now.
>>>
>>> Scheduled.
>>
>> BTW I just saw
On 2014-06-10 00:37, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 10/06/14 00:24, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 10/06/14 00:10, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
>>> fcitx-qt5 can be binNMUed on all archs now.
>>
>> Scheduled.
>
> BTW I just saw this. Is there anything we need to do here?
>
On 10/06/14 00:24, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 10/06/14 00:10, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
>> fcitx-qt5 can be binNMUed on all archs now.
>
> Scheduled.
BTW I just saw this. Is there anything we need to do here?
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-qtdeclarative
On 10/06/14 00:10, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> fcitx-qt5 can be binNMUed on all archs now.
Scheduled.
Emilio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Wednesday 04 June 2014 18:51:51 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Control: forwarded -1
> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/qtbase-abi-5-3-0.html Control:
> tags -1 confirmed
>
> On 31/05/14 22:20, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity:
Control: forwarded -1
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/qtbase-abi-5-3-0.html
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 31/05/14 22:20, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi Release Team! We are ready to go with the private stuff transition for
Qt 5.3.0.
The external (non Qt-stack) packages related are:
fcitx-qt5
gammaray
pyqt5
qtcreator (this last might
13 matches
Mail list logo
