> "Didier" == Didier 'OdyX' Raboud writes:
Didier> Given the situation (an unresponsive Daniel, a proposal from
Didier> people with powers to push the situation forward), I'd be
Didier> more inclined to say yes to Christian, without a formal
Didier> resolution.
Given that Ch
Hi all,
Tollef, thank you for having pushed this topic, we're heading towards a
solution it seems.
Sorry to have taken so long to answer…
Le mercredi, 15 avril 2015, 20.13:44 Tollef Fog Heen a écrit :
> >> Quoting Axel Beckert (a...@debian.org):
> >> > In the long run I'd like to see even more
]] Sam Hartman
> A major advantage of this approach is that it can happen from within the
> aptitude project. Christian has the technical authority to implement
> this. He's asked for review of the social authority, but we could
> support this way of the aptitude project reorganizing itself wit
Hi all,
2015-03-29 21:19 Tollef Fog Heen:
>]] Christian PERRIER
>
>Hi bubulle!
>
>> Quoting Axel Beckert (a...@debian.org):
>>
>> > In the long run I'd like to see even more people working on Aptitude.
>> >
>> > But for that, a possessive lead developer or power games are quite
>> > hindering. IM
2015-03-29 21:19 Tollef Fog Heen:
]] Christian PERRIER
Hi bubulle!
Quoting Axel Beckert (a...@debian.org):
> In the long run I'd like to see even more people working on Aptitude.
>
> But for that, a possessive lead developer or power games are quite
> hindering. IMHO one of the reasons Aptitu
Quoting Tollef Fog Heen (tfh...@err.no):
> > It can't indeed be worse than the current situation anyway.
>
> I see where the proposal is coming from, but I'd like to ask you to hold
> off on it a little bit. I've mailed Daniel and asked him to comment on
> the bug, so hopefully we can have his i
]] Christian PERRIER
Hi bubulle!
> Quoting Axel Beckert (a...@debian.org):
>
> > In the long run I'd like to see even more people working on Aptitude.
> >
> > But for that, a possessive lead developer or power games are quite
> > hindering. IMHO one of the reasons Aptitude's development stalle
(Dropping a bunch of addresses, I believe that those that I removed
are subscribed to the bug report, the mailing list, MIA or not
interested).
Hello,
2015-03-27 21:29 GMT+00:00 Don Armstrong :
> On Fri, 27 Mar 2015, Javier Barroso wrote:
>> Sincerely I would expect this bug to be solved in less
Quoting Axel Beckert (a...@debian.org):
> In the long run I'd like to see even more people working on Aptitude.
>
> But for that, a possessive lead developer or power games are quite
> hindering. IMHO one of the reasons Aptitude's development stalled
> again are those power games we've seen. So I
Hi,
[In the following "Daniel" always refers to Daniel Hartwig, not to
Daniel Burrows. Daniel Burrows is no more involved in Aptitude's
development for quite a while. He's of course still welcome to
continue to contribute to Aptitude, at least from my point of view.]
Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Fri
On Fri, 27 Mar 2015, Javier Barroso wrote:
> Sincerely I would expect this bug to be solved in less than a year. It
> has to been frustrating to be at Manuel circunstances. I know CTTE has
> been very very very busy , I'm understand this is not the biggest
> issue, but 8 month of not activities on
11 matches
Mail list logo
