❦ 14 juillet 2014 09:11 -0300, Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
mauri...@linux.vnet.ibm.com :
I'd like to submit those for Debian once the 2nd patch is accepted.
[...]
Thanks for testing, and nice to see it helps. Both patches are in
upstream elfutils git now and are also applied to the fedora
Hi Vincent,
On 07/31/2015 02:59 PM, Vincent Bernat wrote:
Is there some change on this issue? Would ppc64el works out of the box
with systemtap 2.8 and the current userland in sid?
I'm not sure - I couldn't work further on this.
Currently, Fernando (CC) may have a better understanding on the
On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 16:11 -0300, Mauricio Faria de Oliveira wrote:
I built an elfutils package w/ your patches. The unexpected failures
decreased by 24 (from 835 to 811).
I'd like to submit those for Debian once the 2nd patch is accepted.
(I believe it's close, for I haven't seen replies
Hi Mark,
On 07/14/2014 07:47 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
I'd like to submit those for Debian once the 2nd patch is accepted.
[...]
Thanks for testing, and nice to see it helps. Both patches are in
upstream elfutils git now and are also applied to the fedora rawhide
elfutils package now.
Cool!
Hi,
Mauricio Faria de Oliveira mauri...@linux.vnet.ibm.com writes:
I currently lack some more systemtap background to be sure.. but overall
835 uf/1078 ep vs. 244 uf/1692 ep doesn't look very good. Does that
match your opinion?
Doesn't sound very good indeed. Do you still have detailed logs
BTW. From the systemtap README:
Consider configuring with --enable-dejazilla to automatically
contribute to our public test result database.
That makes it easier to compare test results at
https://web.elastic.org/~dejazilla/viewsummary.php
Also since systemtap depends on elfutils you might
Hi Timo and Mark,
On 07/10/2014 04:36 AM, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote:
Doesn't sound very good indeed. Do you still have detailed logs from
running the testsuites? I think at least the file
testsuite/systemtap.sum should list which tests exactly failed, maybe
there is some common cause to most
Just documenting an observations. Debugging continues tomorrow.
I'll try to find something about the listing_mode failures.
The failing tests are those which do address liblisting_mode.so by
non-absolute pathname. Only the absolute pathname work.
There are 4 modes for specifying the
Hi Timo,
[...] Btw, would it be possible for you to run the upstream testsuite
on that architecture? [...]
Sure. I ran the upstream test-suite on ppc64el and powerpc ports for
comparison, both running on KVM guests, linux kernel 3.14 (Debian).
git remote:
Hi,
Mauricio Faria de Oliveira mauri...@linux.vnet.ibm.com writes:
Thanks for confirming it. These days Timo is more active on SystemTap,
hence I'll wait for him to review and pick for his next upload.
Okay, thanks Ritesh.
I will wait for Timo's opinion.
thanks for the patch, I'm happy to
Hi Ritesh,
You seem to have forgotten to attach the patch.
Oops.. Indeed. :-)
Here it goes.
Thanks,
--
Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
IBM Linux Technology Center
Index: systemtap-2.3/debian/control
===
---
On 06/30/2014 05:13 PM, Mauricio Faria de Oliveira wrote:
Hi Ritesh,
You seem to have forgotten to attach the patch.
Oops.. Indeed. :-)
Here it goes.
But does it build on that architecture. Last I checked systemtap was
limited on the architectures it supported.
Did you successfully
Hi Ritesh,
But does it build on that architecture. Last I checked systemtap was
limited on the architectures it supported.
Did you successfully build it on ppc64el ?
Yes; systemtap 2.3-2 + that patch builds successfully on ppc64el:
[...]
dpkg-deb: building package
On 06/30/2014 06:23 PM, Mauricio Faria de Oliveira wrote:
Hi Ritesh,
But does it build on that architecture. Last I checked systemtap was
limited on the architectures it supported.
Did you successfully build it on ppc64el ?
Yes; systemtap 2.3-2 + that patch builds successfully on
On 06/30/2014 10:13 AM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
Systemtap has worked on (big-endian) ppc64 for a while on other distros.
The (little-endian) ppc64el pieces are being introduced on Debian. :)
Thanks for confirming it. These days Timo is more active on SystemTap,
hence I'll wait for him to
On 06/27/2014 07:16 PM, Mauricio Faria de Oliveira wrote:
Hi Ritesh,
This trivial patch adds ppc64el [1] to the arch list in systemtap.
May you please consider it for an upload?
Thank you,
[1] https://wiki.debian.org/ppc64el
Hello Mauricio,
You seem to have forgotten to attach the
Package: src:systemtap
Version: 2.3-2
Tags: patch
User: debian-powe...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ppc64el
Hi Ritesh,
This trivial patch adds ppc64el [1] to the arch list in systemtap.
May you please consider it for an upload?
Thank you,
[1] https://wiki.debian.org/ppc64el
--
Mauricio Faria
17 matches
Mail list logo
