I propose to close this bug.
There are now three packages close to upload:
* mpfit (gdl-mpfit) - http:://bugs.debian.org/788869
* coyote (gdl-coyote) - http:://bugs.debian.org/789081
* idlastro (gdl-idlastro) - http:://bugs.debian.org/788826
This bug mentiones other packages which
Original Message
Subject: Re: Bug#753620: wishlist: idl/gdl-written software
Resent-Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2014 12:44:12 + (UTC)
Resent-From: debian-as...@lists.debian.org
Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2014 14:43:48 +0200
From: debian-de...@liska.ath.cx (Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr)
Reply-To: Ole
Hi Axel, hi All,
Thanks for quick reply.
On 04/07/14 00:32, Axel Beckert wrote:
While the gnudatalanguage package is their main dependency, this is
actually nothing we can fix in the gnudatalanguage Debian package
itself.
Bascially for each software you listed, there should be an RFP (need
to
Original Message
Subject: Re: Bug#753620: wishlist: idl/gdl-written software
Resent-Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2014 12:45:41 + (UTC)
Resent-From: debian-as...@lists.debian.org
Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2014 14:45:14 +0200
From: debian-de...@liska.ath.cx (Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr)
Reply-To: Ole
Original Message
Subject: Re: Bug#753620: wishlist: idl/gdl-written software
Resent-Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2014 13:56:29 + (UTC)
Resent-From: debian-as...@lists.debian.org
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2014 15:50:19 +0200
From: Sergio Gelato sergio.gel...@astro.su.se
To: debian
On 07/04/2014 03:25 PM, Sylwester Arabas wrote:
- how to make these packages usable for IDL / PV-WAVE users?
Since IDL is non-free, I would consider this not as a primary goal. I
would concentrate on GDL.
I wonder what Sywester means by making useable...
- should idlastro be splitted into
Original Message
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: [gnudatalanguage-devel] Fwd: Re: Bug#753620:
wishlist: idl/gdl-written software
Resent-Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2014 15:56:44 + (UTC)
Resent-From: debian-as...@lists.debian.org
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2014 17:46:16 +0200
From: Sergio Gelato
Original Message
Subject: Re: Bug#753620: wishlist: idl/gdl-written software
Resent-Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2014 16:20:44 + (UTC)
Resent-From: debian-as...@lists.debian.org
Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2014 18:20:27 +0200
From: debian-de...@liska.ath.cx (Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr)
Reply-To: Ole
Original Message
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: [gnudatalanguage-devel] Fwd: Re: Bug#753620:
wishlist: idl/gdl-written software
Resent-Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2014 16:28:13 + (UTC)
Resent-From: debian-as...@lists.debian.org
Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2014 18:27:55 +0200
From: debian-de
Hi All,
Thanks for all the comments!
On 04/07/14 14:45, Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr wrote:
- where to place the IDL/GDL-written software in the system
Since they are not machine specific, maybe a good place would be
/usr/share/gdl-packages/ ?
For the record, we have already /usr/share/gnudatalanguage/
Package: gnudatalanguage
Severity: wishlist
Dear All,
As a follow-up from a recent discussion at the GDL workshop in Paris,
I'd like to ask for any possibilities of shipping idl/gdl-written
software in Debian.
A flagship example is the NASA Astronomy Library written in IDL but
released as
Hi Sylwester,
Sylwester Arabas wrote:
Package: gnudatalanguage
While the gnudatalanguage package is their main dependency, this is
actually nothing we can fix in the gnudatalanguage Debian package
itself.
Bascially for each software you listed, there should be an RFP (need
to be filed against
12 matches
Mail list logo
