Control: severity -1 important
Hi!
On Sat, 19 Jul 2014 23:20:58 +0200 Francesco Muzio
wrote:
> Package: kdm
> Version: 4:4.11.9-1
> Severity: minor
>
> Dear maintainers,
> My machine (updated debian testing) has only KDM as display manager, it
> starts without problem after upgrading/trasition
On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 09:05:17AM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 04/02/2015 10:15 PM, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> > My patch from https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=754314
> > retains the kdmrc customisation currently present in the sysvinit script;
> > maybe you can fo
On 04/02/2015 10:15 PM, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> My patch from https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=754314
> retains the kdmrc customisation currently present in the sysvinit script;
> maybe you can fold that one into your patch?
Hmm, I haven't realized that the display manager's co
On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 04:20:06PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 04/02/2015 12:57 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> > Attaching a debdiff with the proposed changes to the kde-workspace
> > source package which will add systemd support to kdm.
>
> Attaching a cleaned up revision
On 04/02/2015 04:20 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Attaching a cleaned up revision the patch where I fixed the tab stops
> and added an additional line in the debian/changelog to indicate that
> the file debian/kdm.service was added to the source package.
While reviewing my patch again I s
On 04/02/2015 12:57 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Attaching a debdiff with the proposed changes to the kde-workspace
> source package which will add systemd support to kdm.
Attaching a cleaned up revision the patch where I fixed the tab stops
and added an additional line in the debian/cha
On 01/10/2015 03:26 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> In any case, I will hopefully provide an updated kdm package
> in the following week that you can try at your desire.
Attaching a debdiff with the proposed changes to the kde-workspace
source package which will add systemd support to kdm.
On 01/10/2015 03:11 PM, Francesco Muzio wrote:
>> It actually depends on which package you reconfigure. So, if you run
>> "dpkg-reconfigure lightdm" (provided that lightdm is installed) and
>> choose "kdm as your default DM, it should work. However, if you do
>> that with "dpkg-reconfigure kdm" and
Il 10/01/2015 02:18, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ha scritto:
that this symlink is actually always created by the postinst script of
the display manager (on Debian, Fedora uses the [Install] section of
the .service file for that by setting an alias to
display-manager.service) and looking at the sour
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 01:18:59AM +0100, Francesco Muzio wrote:
> how many display managers are installed on your systems?
As I said, that was a test system and there was only KDM installed,
nothing else. I have to poke around a bit more. However, it seems ...
> if I install slim a soft link
> /
also I think it's impossible that a soft-link
/etc/systemd/system/display-manager.service is created on a fresh
install who only installs KDM as display-manager.service.
Otherwise on the system there would be a
/etc/systemd/system/display-manager.service who not point to no service.
--
To U
Il 10/01/2015 00:43, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ha scritto:
Ok, I thoroughly analyzed your qemu image and eventually found out that
the symbolic link /etc/systemd/system/display-manager.service which
points to /lib/systemd/system/kdm.service was missing. A simple
ln -s /lib/systemd/syste
On 01/09/2015 11:38 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 01/09/2015 11:34 PM, Francesco Muzio wrote:
>> I have tried the kdm.service file in my real Debian environment and in
>> the VM that I have shared with you, in both cases KDM will not start at
>> boot
>
> Is kdm actually configured to b
On 01/09/2015 11:34 PM, Francesco Muzio wrote:
> I have tried the kdm.service file in my real Debian environment and in
> the VM that I have shared with you, in both cases KDM will not start at
> boot
Is kdm actually configured to be your default display manager?
root@vs76:~> cat /etc/X11/default
Il 09/01/2015 22:45, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ha scritto:
Ok, I actually understand now what your problem is. What you are seeing
there is a mere *warning* by the systemd generator for the display
manager unit that there is no service file for kdm present and that
systemd used different means l
Control: tags -1 -unreproducible
Control: tags -1 patch
Control: retitle -1 kdm: Please add a systemd service file
On 01/09/2015 08:14 PM, Francesco Muzio wrote:
> it means if you type the command
>
> # journalctl --no-pager | grep display-manager
>
> no output is printed ?
Ok, I actually under
Il 09/01/2015 15:45, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ha scritto:
After that finished, I rebooted the machine and it booted right
into kdm without any issues or error messages. Whatever I did,
I could*NOT* reproduce your problem - at all.
it means if you type the command
# journalctl --no-pager | g
Control: tags -1 unreproducible
On 01/08/2015 11:49 PM, Francesco Muzio wrote:
> systemd[1]: Cannot add dependency job for unit display-manager.service,
> ignoring: Unit display-manager.service failed to load: No such file or
> directory.
>
> I think it's a normal behaviour if kdm does not provid
Il 08/01/2015 23:27, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ha scritto:
I can, btw, not examine your qemu image since you did not provide
me with any passwords. I would have mount it manually now and modify
the passwd database but you could have just told me the password.
Oops... I have forget to tell you
On 01/08/2015 11:19 PM, Francesco Muzio wrote:
> Because I had to recreate my problem with an image as small as possible.
It was a suggestion, a guess out of the dark. I didn't tell you to do
it, I merely asked whether this might help in this case. I didn't know
about the systemd generators at the
Why did you copy the extra kdm.service file into the systemd directory?
Because you have told me to do it.
see https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=755359#10
There is something that you are fundamentally doing wrong. I assume you
do a minimal installation without using tasksel
On 01/08/2015 10:25 PM, Francesco Muzio wrote:
> I have downloaded the latest weekly build of
> debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso image and I have installed it on a qcow2
> image of 4GB
>
> I have installed kde-plasma-desktop and kdm.
> I have put the correct kdm.service in the /lib/systemd/system/
I have done a test with a new installation of Debian.
Yesterday I have created a minimal installation of Debian for i386
architecture with qemu.
I have downloaded the latest weekly build of
debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso image and I have installed it on a qcow2
image of 4GB
I have installe
On 01/06/2015 11:58 PM, Francesco Muzio wrote:
> Ok, next days I try to test your solution on a most recent installation
> of Debian
For the records: I just did a clean installation of Jessie and choose
KDE as the default desktop without any other desktops or display
managers installed and kdm wor
Ok, next days I try to test your solution on a most recent installation
of Debian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On 01/06/2015 11:41 PM, Francesco Muzio wrote:
> In any case you can close the bug. It isn't an important bug and KDM is
> the past.
Well, I'm not saying that I don't care. If there is actually a bug, I
want to help fixing it. However, my problem is that I cannot reproduce
the bug in any way which
Il 06/01/2015 22:35, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ha scritto:
I presume you probably ran into this issue [1] which has been fixed
in systemd 215-8. This version of systemd includes a generator which
creates the necessary display manager unit file on-the-fly.
I'm using a Debian testing constantly
On 01/06/2015 10:20 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 01/06/2015 08:59 PM, Francesco Muzio wrote:
>> I just wanted to point out a lack of compatibility between the KDM and
>> systemd. This before to know that SDDM will be the new replacement of KDM
>
> But it works here after a fresh insta
On 01/06/2015 08:59 PM, Francesco Muzio wrote:
> I just wanted to point out a lack of compatibility between the KDM and
> systemd. This before to know that SDDM will be the new replacement of KDM
But it works here after a fresh install. If there was an actual
incompatibility with kdm on systemd, t
ops... I have correct only the path for the var ExecStartPre
Now I have done a new test with both paths updated:
- I have copied the file kdm.service to /lib/systemd/system/kdm.service
- I have rebooted the system
kdm is not started, the output of systemctl status kdm shows me the
service as i
On 01/06/2015 07:09 PM, Francesco Muzio wrote:
> thanks for your reply, but
>
> kdm is located at /usr/bin/kdm and not /usr/sbin/kdm
Ah, true. That's actually uncommon for the display manager not
to be under /usr/sbin/ as gdm3 and lightdm are. That's why I
incorrectly assumed it would be true f
thanks for your reply, but
kdm is located at /usr/bin/kdm and not /usr/sbin/kdm
with the correct kdm.service file the display manager won't start and
the message about display-manager.service still exists.
after a boot the command systemctl status kdm.service shows me this
● kdm.service -
Hello Franceso!
kdm is missing a systemd service file. I am not sure whether this is
related to your problem, but you could add the attached kdm.service
file and add it to /lib/systemd/system and see if that fixes your
problem.
Cheers,
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian
Package: kdm
Version: 4:4.11.9-1
Severity: minor
Dear maintainers,
My machine (updated debian testing) has only KDM as display manager, it
starts without problem after upgrading/trasition to systemd.
But in journald log I see this message
systemd[1]: Cannot add dependency job for unit display
34 matches
Mail list logo
