On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 22:54:16 +0200, Ross Gammon wrote:
> All that is left is a binNMU for pktools now:
>
> nmu pktools_2.5.3-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against libLAS 1.8.0."
Done for ALL -arm64 -hurd-i386 -ppc64el
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 08/22/2014 05:41 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 08/21/2014 06:09 PM, Ross Gammon wrote:
>> 5) binNMU pktools
>
> Once the mips build is done in a couple of days, I think dep-wait
> requests for the BD-Uninstallable architectures should be used just
> in case the GDAL build is fixed in t
On 08/21/2014 06:09 PM, Ross Gammon wrote:
> 5) binNMU pktools
Once the mips build is done in a couple of days, I think dep-wait
requests for the BD-Uninstallable architectures should be used just in
case the GDAL build is fixed in the mean time.
I think the syntax for the nmu and dw commands sho
1) Wait for pktools 2.5.3 to migrate to testing
2) Verify that pktools built successfully on arm*
3) Move libLAS 1.8.0 from experimental to unstable
4) Verify that liblas has built on all architectures
5) binNMU pktools
1&2 have happened, so I will begin to move libLAS to unstable.
Ross
signat
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 15/08/14 22:04, Ross Gammon wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> Forwarded: https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-liblas.html
>
> Dear Release Team,
>
> In the Debi
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Forwarded: https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-liblas.html
Dear Release Team,
In the Debian GIS Team we would like to start a mini-transition for
liblas. Even though it is s
6 matches
Mail list logo
