Bernhard R. Link:
> May I suggest to just duplicate the DH_ALWAYS_EXCLUDE handling in
> dh_fixmtimes for the time being?
>
> If they are already removed then dh_builddeb should not do any new harm
> and this way you keep more control over dh_fixmtimes so there is less
> chances debhelper will ship
* Jérémy Bobbio [141228 22:06]:
> Joey Hess:
> > Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> > > Joey Hess:
> > > > My other idea is to make dh_fixmtimes set something that a later command
> > > > (eg, dh_builddeb) could use and warn if it was not run.
> > >
> > > Maybe it should be integrated to dh_builddeb, then?
>
Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> Joey Hess:
> > Do you have a plan to get packages not using dh or cdbs to use this new
> > command?
>
> Its heart is a single find+xargs+touch command. I had in mind that
> packages not using dh or cdbs could have their own way on how to make
> the mtimes deterministic. Poss
Joey Hess:
> Do you have a plan to get packages not using dh or cdbs to use this new
> command?
Its heart is a single find+xargs+touch command. I had in mind that
packages not using dh or cdbs could have their own way on how to make
the mtimes deterministic. Possibly by adding such a find command
+1
Do you have a plan to get packages not using dh or cdbs to use this new
command?
I can think of 2 ways.. one is to add it to some existing command,
perhaps renaming the command. I thought maybe dh_fixperms could be
renamed to dh_fixmetadata. But, I think some will use dh_fixperms -X to
exclude
5 matches
Mail list logo
