Bug#760849: transition: glew

Hi! On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 6:08 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> What am I supposed to do now? >> Is it a good time for uploading it to unstable? > > Yes, you can go ahead. Uploaded. Thanks. > BTW please make sure those packages that fail to build have RC bugs reported >

Bug#760849: transition: glew

Hi again! I need to follow-up to my previous mail, adding the following info: On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 10:17 AM, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote: > [...] > * libreoffice_1:5.0.3~rc1-2 => CHECK <= this can be set to OK > [...] > * tulip_4.7.0dfsg-2 => FTBFS <= it's a FTBFS (no

Bug#760849: transition: glew

Control: tags -1 confirmed On 09/11/15 10:17, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote: > Dear Release Team, > > FYI, the 1.13.0 stable version has been released meanwhile by upstream > on October 15, 2015. > > On October 25, 2015 a first testing-purpose package has been uploaded > to experimental and with the

Bug#760849: transition: glew

Dear Release Team, FYI, the 1.13.0 stable version has been released meanwhile by upstream on October 15, 2015. On October 25, 2015 a first testing-purpose package has been uploaded to experimental and with the huge help (as usual) from Luca Falavigna (dktrkranz) and his Deb-O-Matic

Bug#760849: transition: glew

Hi Emilio! On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort po...@debian.org wrote: So `pkg-config --cflags glew' used to return -I/usr/include/GL in 1.10, but no longer does in 1.12. Since the rest of the packages #include GL/glew.h, they can find the header just fine. But this

Bug#760849: transition: glew

On 02/07/15 09:33, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote: Hi Emilio! On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 7:17 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort po...@debian.org wrote: On 01/07/15 17:10, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote: Hi Jonathan! On Thu, 21 May 2015 11:59:44 +0100 Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org wrote: Could you

Bug#760849: transition: glew

On 02/07/15 09:33, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote: Hi Emilio! On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 7:17 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort po...@debian.org wrote: On 01/07/15 17:10, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote: Hi Jonathan! On Thu, 21 May 2015 11:59:44 +0100 Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org wrote: Could you

Bug#760849: transition: glew

Hi Emilio! On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 7:17 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort po...@debian.org wrote: On 01/07/15 17:10, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote: Hi Jonathan! On Thu, 21 May 2015 11:59:44 +0100 Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org wrote: Could you summarise which packages now ftbfs, and the ones you

Bug#760849: transition: glew

Hi Jonathan! On Thu, 21 May 2015 11:59:44 +0100 Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org wrote: Could you summarise which packages now ftbfs, and the ones you think may be GLEW-related? So, I tested the 11 packages that were failing on 1.11.0 and built them back against 1.12.0 and the results are:

Bug#760849: transition: glew

On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 11:10 PM, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote: - warzone2100 Upstream have patches for this: http://developer.wz2100.net/ticket/4300 http://developer.wz2100.net/ticket/4218 -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#760849: transition: glew

On 01/07/15 17:10, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote: Hi Jonathan! On Thu, 21 May 2015 11:59:44 +0100 Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org wrote: Could you summarise which packages now ftbfs, and the ones you think may be GLEW-related? So, I tested the 11 packages that were failing on 1.11.0 and

Bug#760849: transition: glew

On 2015-05-21 11:20, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote: Conditions for the package building hasn't changed in this period. Some of them ftbfs for issues not related to GLEW, others maybe do. Could you summarise which packages now ftbfs, and the ones you think may be GLEW-related? I've seen that

Bug#760849: transition: glew

Dear Release Team, FYI, the 1.12.0 stable version has been released meanwhile by upstream on January 26, 2015... in deep jessie freeze, then. On May 6, 2015 a first testing-purpose package (followed by another debian revision fixing few minor issues few days ago) has been uploaded to

Bug#760849: transition: glew

Hi, On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 05:59:22PM +0200, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote: For the record, in the meanwhile I've re-tested those two packages (except for LibreOffice) that were failing due to lack of free space on the machinery and they build fine now. FWIW, LibreOffice also builds fine; tested

Bug#760849: transition: glew

Hi Rene! On Sep 14, 2014 7:42 PM, Rene Engelhard r...@debian.org wrote: Hi, On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 05:59:22PM +0200, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote: For the record, in the meanwhile I've re-tested those two packages (except for LibreOffice) that were failing due to lack of free space on the

Bug#760849: transition: glew

Hi! On 2014-09-08 at 17:52 (CEST), Niels Thykier wrote: As mentioned over IRC, the transition freeze has started. Accordingly, this transition will be deferred til Jessie +1. Feel free to ping us about this transition after the freeze. Good. For the record, in the meanwhile I've re-tested

Bug#760849: transition: glew

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Dear Release Team, I'm filing this bug for a new transition of glew package. On August 11, 2014 the 1.11.0 actual stable version has been released by upstream. On August 24, 2014 a

Bug#760849: transition: glew

Control: tags -1 jessie-ignore On 2014-09-08 15:40, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Dear Release Team, I'm filing this bug for a new transition of glew package. [...] Hi, As