On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 9:06 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Restoring the apt binary in the openjdk-7-jdk package should fix this
> issue. It was removed in openjdk-7/7u65-2.5.1-5 but it's still available
> upstream.
>
> This issue will come back with the Java 8 transition.
I looked at what it will t
Le 10/10/2014 15:57, tony mancill a écrit :
> Should we file a bug against openjdk-7 and then mark the 2 affected
> FTBFS as blocked?
Yes I think so, reverting the change in openjdk-7 is the best solution
to be ready in time for Jessie.
Emmanuel Bourg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-d
On 10/10/2014 06:06 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Restoring the apt binary in the openjdk-7-jdk package should fix this
> issue. It was removed in openjdk-7/7u65-2.5.1-5 but it's still available
> upstream.
>
> This issue will come back with the Java 8 transition.
Yeah, my thought was that we could
Restoring the apt binary in the openjdk-7-jdk package should fix this
issue. It was removed in openjdk-7/7u65-2.5.1-5 but it's still available
upstream.
This issue will come back with the Java 8 transition.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
On 09/12/2014 02:14 AM, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Source: lwjgl
> Version: 2.7.1+dfsg-3
> Severity: serious
> Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
> Forwarded: https://github.com/LWJGL/lwjgl/issues/6
>
> While attempting to fix lwjgl's other FTBFS by removin
Source: lwjgl
Version: 2.7.1+dfsg-3
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Forwarded: https://github.com/LWJGL/lwjgl/issues/6
While attempting to fix lwjgl's other FTBFS by removing the Build-Conflicts
with binutils-gold, I got this error,
6 matches
Mail list logo
