* Andrii Senkovych jolly_ro...@itblog.org.ua, 2014-10-02, 22:44:
Is it ok to look for a sponsor in some user lists? It seems readers of
debian-cloud@lists.d.o may be interested in the package.
I think asking at debian-cloud@ is indeed your best bet.
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Jakub,
Can you perhaps give an advice where sponsor could be found?
Unfortunately, there's no dedicated team for FUSE modules support. By
looking on the list of packages FUSE maintained supports It seems he
is already busy with lots of stuff. Is it ok to look for a sponsor in
some user lists? It
Jakub, thank you for a review, answers inline
.orig.tar.gz is not bitwise-identical to the one uscan downloads. Why?
It seems git-buildpackage has repacked the tarball, I've done new
upload with the correct orig tarball.
Current standards version is 3.9.6. (But beware that Lintian doesn't know
On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 02:03:53PM +0300, Andrii Senkovych wrote:
Jakub, thank you for a review, answers inline
.orig.tar.gz is not bitwise-identical to the one uscan downloads. Why?
It seems git-buildpackage has repacked the tarball, I've done new
upload with the correct orig tarball.
gbp
* Andrii Senkovych jolly_ro...@itblog.org.ua, 2014-10-01, 14:03:
You don't have to specify full debian-policy version in the
Standards-Version field. Only the first three components (that is,
3.9.5 or 3.9.6) have to be specified. (Policy ยง5.6.11)
I used to write the full version in all my
[I don't intend to sponsor this package. Sorry!]
* Andriy Senkovych jolly_ro...@itblog.org.ua, 2014-09-17, 22:00:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/s3fs-fuse/s3fs-fuse_1.78-1.dsc
.orig.tar.gz is not bitwise-identical to the one uscan downloads. Why?
Current standards version is
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package s3fs-fuse
* Package name: s3fs-fuse
Version : 1.78-1
Upstream Author : Randy Rizun rri...@gmail.com
* URL : https://github.com/s3fs-fuse/s3fs-fuse
* License
7 matches
Mail list logo
