Bug#762829: file: Pascal modules (ISO 10206) wrongly classified as text/x-ruby

2016-07-22 Thread Peter
Hi, I realise now I was not subscribed to the bug, so format/linkage of this reply might be a bit of a mess. Sorry! > To improve the situation without breaking detection of other text > file types, I need a fine selection of typical pascal programs. Not > necessarily a big number but a huge varie

Bug#762829: file: Pascal modules (ISO 10206) wrongly classified as text/x-ruby

2016-07-22 Thread Peter
On 16/07/16 23:28, Christoph Biedl wrote: > tags 762829 confirmed upstream help > thanks > > It's been a while but it hasn't been forgotten ... > > Peter wrote... > >> Some Pascal source files are classified as Ruby. >> Maybe file is confused by the keywords 'module', 'import' and export, >> whi

Bug#762829: file: Pascal modules (ISO 10206) wrongly classified as text/x-ruby

2016-07-17 Thread Christoph Biedl
Christoph Biedl wrote... > tags 762829 help Refining this: The detection of Pascal programs in file is a mess. To improve the situation without breaking detection of other text file types, I need a fine selection of typical pascal programs. Not necessarily a big number but a huge variety in style

Bug#762829: file: Pascal modules (ISO 10206) wrongly classified as text/x-ruby

2016-07-16 Thread Christoph Biedl
tags 762829 confirmed upstream help thanks It's been a while but it hasn't been forgotten ... Peter wrote... > Some Pascal source files are classified as Ruby. > Maybe file is confused by the keywords 'module', 'import' and export, > which are valid Pascal extension keywords in ISO 10206? Corre

Bug#762829: file: Pascal modules (ISO 10206) wrongly classified as text/x-ruby

2014-09-25 Thread Peter
Package: file Version: 1:5.19-2 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, Some Pascal source files are classified as Ruby. Maybe file is confused by the keywords 'module', 'import' and export, which are valid Pascal extension keywords in ISO 10206? A short example is attached. -- System Information: D