Bug#762981: The first user should be a member of the lpadmin group

2015-10-15 Thread Wolfgang Schweer
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 08:27:36AM +, Mike Gabriel wrote: > Ok. I get that. The balance here is: simple for maintainers and simple for > first-time users/admins. Yes. Hard to find the right one. > >Also, avoiding changes to the initial > >LDAP data base would make upgrading easier. > > I al

Bug#762981: The first user should be a member of the lpadmin group

2014-09-26 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Petter Reinholdtsen] > We should look for a way to get the same effect for CUPS > administration. I had a closer look, and one fix would be to tell cups to treat all members of one of the groups granting privileges as a system user. This can be done by adding the to the list of privileged groups

Bug#762981: The first user should be a member of the lpadmin group

2014-09-26 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[David Prévot] > In order to be able to actually administrate the printers (CUPS), > the first user has to be added to the lpadmin group. It would be > nice if that was done by default (on tjener, where CUPS is > installed). Note, the first user exist only in LDAP and Kerberos, while the lpadmin g

Bug#762981: The first user should be a member of the lpadmin group

2014-09-26 Thread David Prévot
Source: debian-edu-config Severity: wishlist Hi, In order to be able to actually administrate the printers (CUPS), the first user has to be added to the lpadmin group. It would be nice if that was done by default (on tjener, where CUPS is installed). One alternative would be to use the root acco