On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 08:34:53PM +0100, Mark Baker wrote:
On 27 Sep 2014, at 16:10, Ólafur Jens Sigurðsson ojs...@gmail.com wrote:
The package fails to build on hurd because the pthread stack size in
only 2024 kb instead of the 8192 kb that linux has.
Would it be a good idea to use
On 27 Sep 2014, at 16:10, Ólafur Jens Sigurðsson ojs...@gmail.com wrote:
The package fails to build on hurd because the pthread stack size in
only 2024 kb instead of the 8192 kb that linux has.
Would it be a good idea to use the heap instead of the stack to fix
this?
I have considered
Ólafur Jens Sigurðsson, le Sat 27 Sep 2014 15:10:47 +, a écrit :
The package fails to build on hurd because the pthread stack size in
only 2024 kb instead of the 8192 kb that linux has.
Well, ideally hurd should be made to get its stack size for ulimit -s
too. It should be a matter of using
Samuel Thibault, le Sun 28 Sep 2014 22:22:47 +0200, a écrit :
Ólafur Jens Sigurðsson, le Sat 27 Sep 2014 15:10:47 +, a écrit :
The package fails to build on hurd because the pthread stack size in
only 2024 kb instead of the 8192 kb that linux has.
Well, ideally hurd should be made to
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 11:37:30PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Samuel Thibault, le Sun 28 Sep 2014 22:22:47 +0200, a écrit :
Ólafur Jens Sigurðsson, le Sat 27 Sep 2014 15:10:47 +, a écrit :
The package fails to build on hurd because the pthread stack size in
only 2024 kb instead of
Samuel Thibault, le Sun 28 Sep 2014 23:37:30 +0200, a écrit :
What we can do is simply make the hurd's libpthread default 8192KiB like
Linux, to avoid differing too much from the Linux defaults and get such
bugs just due to differing defaults.
I have committed it to glibc.
I'll build pcre3 by
Source: pcre3
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: fails to build from source
Dear Maintainer,
The package fails to build on hurd because the pthread stack size in
only 2024 kb instead of the 8192 kb that linux has.
Would it be a good idea to use the heap instead of the stack to fix
7 matches
Mail list logo
