Control: reassign -1 src:cbmc
Am 08.10.2014 um 02:45 schrieb Debian Bug Tracking System:
Processing control commands:
reassign -1 g++-4.9 4.9.1-16
Bug #763228 [src:cbmc] cbmc: FTBFS: ld: final link failed: Bad value
Bug reassigned from package 'src:cbmc' to 'g++-4.9'.
No longer marked as
Hi Matthias,
[...]
afaics not a GCC issue. please recheck with binutils 2.24.51.20141001-3
This *is* binutils 2.24.51.20141001-3:
# zcat /usr/share/doc/binutils/changelog.Debian.gz | head -n 1
binutils (2.24.51.20141001-3) unstable; urgency=medium
And indeed only this version would yield
Am 08.10.2014 um 09:34 schrieb Michael Tautschnig:
Hi Matthias,
[...]
afaics not a GCC issue. please recheck with binutils 2.24.51.20141001-3
This *is* binutils 2.24.51.20141001-3:
# zcat /usr/share/doc/binutils/changelog.Debian.gz | head -n 1
binutils (2.24.51.20141001-3) unstable;
Control: forwarded -1 https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17467
Hi again,
[...]
So if it isn't a GCC issue, should I reassign to binutils instead? (I have
no
intention of playing a bug-assigning ping-pong, but I do fail to see what
might
be wrong in CBMC. But I'm happy to
Control: reassign -1 g++-4.9 4.9.1-16
Control: affects -1 cbmc
This also occurs with arb:
https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=arbarch=i386ver=6.0.2-1stamp=1412337993file=log
It seems to be a bug in binutils[1].
I'd say a change in binutils exposed a bug somewhere in the toolchain.
This also occurs with arb:
https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=arbarch=i386ver=6.0.2-1stamp=1412337993file=log
It seems to be a bug in binutils[1].
I'd say a change in binutils exposed a bug somewhere in the toolchain.
Here's the commit which added the check and the message:
Hello,
Same problem here when trying to compile LLVM/clang:
.eh_frame_hdr refers to overlapping FDEs.
It seems to be a bug in binutils[1].
I updated to binutils 2.24.51.20140918-1 today at 11:05:02:
before this the compilation was working correctly.
[1]
Source: cbmc
Version: 4.9-3
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140926 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
/usr/bin/ld:
8 matches
Mail list logo