Bug#764341: Re-enable JIT, YARR_JIT and ASSEMBLER on armhf

2014-10-07 Thread Iain Lane
Source: webkitgtk Version: 2.4.5-1 Severity: normal Hi, I think that with the change in 9c846a3f60213235e402d1367fea799421e5b82b, armhf was left out of the new list by mistake. We've had it enabled for some time both in Debian and Ubuntu and I'm not aware of any problems. If this was

Bug#764341: Re-enable JIT, YARR_JIT and ASSEMBLER on armhf

2014-10-07 Thread Alberto Garcia
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 12:47:04PM +0100, Iain Lane wrote: I think that with the change in 9c846a3f60213235e402d1367fea799421e5b82b, armhf was left out of the new list by mistake. We've had it enabled for some time both in Debian and Ubuntu and I'm not aware of any problems. I have the

Bug#764341: Re-enable JIT, YARR_JIT and ASSEMBLER on armhf

2014-10-07 Thread Alberto Garcia
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 12:47:04PM +0100, Iain Lane wrote: I think that with the change in 9c846a3f60213235e402d1367fea799421e5b82b, armhf was left out of the new list by mistake. We've had it enabled for some time both in Debian and Ubuntu and I'm not aware of any problems. In the case of

Bug#764341: Re-enable JIT, YARR_JIT and ASSEMBLER on armhf

2014-10-07 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 07/10/14 17:20, Alberto Garcia wrote: On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 12:47:04PM +0100, Iain Lane wrote: I think that with the change in 9c846a3f60213235e402d1367fea799421e5b82b, armhf was left out of the new list by mistake. We've had it enabled for some time both in Debian and Ubuntu and I'm not

Bug#764341: Re-enable JIT, YARR_JIT and ASSEMBLER on armhf

2014-10-07 Thread Iain Lane
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 05:32:51PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: On 07/10/14 17:20, Alberto Garcia wrote: […] So Debian armel runs on a minimum CPU of ARMv4t and by default the Debian armel GCC generates code for armv4t (rather than the usual default ARM target of armv5t). So I

Bug#764341: Re-enable JIT, YARR_JIT and ASSEMBLER on armhf

2014-10-07 Thread Alberto Garcia
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 05:32:51PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: So I guess we either disable JIT or drop support for armv4. I think we already agreed on the former on IRC. Yes, I just wanted to explain it here again. In the case of armhf I've just finished building JavaScriptCore