Hi!
On Fri, 2014-10-24 at 09:29:28 -0400, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Guillem Jover [2014-10-24 10:31 +0200]:
> > With newer dpkg-dev, that's what should happen indeed.
> >
> > Just wanted to let you know, so that you can sleep better at night. :)
>
> Ah, thanks for the heads-up! But I think it was goo
Hello Guillem,
Guillem Jover [2014-10-24 10:31 +0200]:
> With newer dpkg-dev, that's what should happen indeed.
>
> Just wanted to let you know, so that you can sleep better at night. :)
Ah, thanks for the heads-up! But I think it was good to fix in
autopkgtest anyway, in the spirit of "be liber
Hi!
On Sun, 2014-10-12 at 14:51:53 +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Tristan Seligmann [2014-10-11 13:46 +0200]:
> > I've attached some debug logs.
>
> Thanks. Of course I forgot to ask you about attaching your .changes
> files, but I bet I know what's wrong. So far every .changes file I
> looked at ha
On 12 October 2014 14:51, Martin Pitt wrote:
> So I bet in your .changes files the .dsc appears before the .debs. In
> this case I can reproduce the problem (I just wrote a trivial test
> case). This is a bug anyway, so I'll fix that. But I'd like you to
> confirm this to exclude the possibility t
Le dimanche 12 octobre 2014 à 15:00 +0200, Martin Pitt a écrit :
> Control: tag -1 pending
>
> I fixed this in
>
>
> http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/autopkgtest/autopkgtest.git/commit/?id=0d2b26b1
>
> This is pending confirmation from my previous reply, but I'm fairly
> sure that this is the p
Control: tag -1 pending
I fixed this in
http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/autopkgtest/autopkgtest.git/commit/?id=0d2b26b1
This is pending confirmation from my previous reply, but I'm fairly
sure that this is the problem.
Thanks for the report!
Martin
--
Martin Pitt| ht
Hello Tristan, hello Jérémy,
Tristan Seligmann [2014-10-11 13:46 +0200]:
> I've attached some debug logs.
Thanks. Of course I forgot to ask you about attaching your .changes
files, but I bet I know what's wrong. So far every .changes file I
looked at hat the .debs first and then the .dsc. That se
Hi,
i'm seeing a failure that could be caused by the same problem:
http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-javascript/node-crc.git
you can gbp-pull && git-buildpackage that one, and
adt-run --changes=/path/to/node-crc_3.0.0-1_amd64.changes --- schroot
sid-amd64-sbuild
Debug log attached.
Jérémy.
a
On 11 October 2014 13:26, Martin Pitt wrote:
> This works fine for me, and there's also a test case for it. Can you
> please describe precisely what you did and which exact commands you
> ran? Please also attach the full output of adt-run, preferably with -d
> (debug info).
I've attached some deb
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
Hello Tristan,
Tristan Seligmann [2014-10-11 9:15 +0200]:
> When passing a .changes containing binary packages to --changes, the
> binary and source packages seem to be registered in the wrong order,
> causing the dependency installation to fail as the binary packages fr
Package: autopkgtest
Version: 3.5.5
Severity: normal
When passing a .changes containing binary packages to --changes, the
binary and source packages seem to be registered in the wrong order,
causing the dependency installation to fail as the binary packages from
the .changes are not yet available.
11 matches
Mail list logo
