I just reviewed and pushed those patches to upstream repo.
Thanks for your contribution.
On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 6:53 AM, Andreas Beckmann a...@debian.org wrote:
On 2014-10-31 09:29, Zhigang Gong wrote:
Just want to mention, the beignet version 1.0 will be released within two
weeks,
if
On 2014-10-30 21:10, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
If you're offering to NMU this, it would be a good idea to put back the
patch description header I accidentally deleted, and to do #767387 at
the same time.
I've imported the packaging history into git and prepared the new
upstream there, too. This
Just want to mention, the beignet version 1.0 will be released within two weeks,
if everything is ok. And all the known copyright issue will be solved
before that.
Thanks,
Zhigang Gong.
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 3:37 PM, Andreas Beckmann a...@debian.org wrote:
On 2014-10-30 21:10, Rebecca N.
You have my blessing to change the maintainer field if you like, as I
won't be able to do as much as is needed in the next days.
It would probably make sense for the pkg-opencl-devel list to own this
package; I'm willing to be named as uploader, but will need a sponsor to
actually upload
On 2014-10-31 19:12, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
It would probably make sense for the pkg-opencl-devel list to own this
That's what I wanted to do anyway :-)
package; I'm willing to be named as uploader,
Great! Done :-)
but will need a sponsor to
actually upload anything.
That can be managed
On 2014-10-31 09:29, Zhigang Gong wrote:
Just want to mention, the beignet version 1.0 will be released within two
weeks,
if everything is ok. And all the known copyright issue will be solved
before that.
Good to know, but it will be a bit too late for inclusion in Debian 8.0.
So I'll try to
On Tue, 28 Oct 2014 18:56:52 +, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
This occurs because beignet currently expects llvm 3.4 but Depends: on the
default, which recently changed to 3.5 (#760050); the attached fixes it by
explicitly using 3.4 everywhere.
Just out of curiosity:
The test failure in
Am Thu, 30 Oct 2014 19:34:17 +0100
schrieb gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org:
Just out of curiosity:
The test failure in #759933 was fixed by a patch that changed the
dependencies in 0.8-1.1 from the versioned|general vresions to the
versioned ones:
- llvm-3.4-dev | llvm-dev (= 1:3.4),
-
I'm just wondering where
the build failure in late August with exactly those dependencies came
from and why the change fixed them?
during compilation clang
was called but could not be found:
[...]
Only the clang metapackage but not the clang-some.version package
provides /usr/bin/clang.
Control: tags -1 patch
This occurs because beignet currently expects llvm 3.4 but Depends: on
the default, which recently changed to 3.5 (#760050); the attached fixes
it by explicitly using 3.4 everywhere.
(Testing note: Due to linux bug #767148, neither the existing beignet
nor this
Package: beignet
Version: 0.8-1.1
Severity: serious
Usertags: goto-cc
During a rebuild of all Debian packages in a clean sid chroot (using cowbuilder
and pbuilder) the build failed with the following error.
[...]
[ 0%] Generating ocl_memcpy.ll.bc
cd
11 matches
Mail list logo
