On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 08:51:44PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 23:38:24 +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 12:28:22PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Bill Allombert ballo...@debian.org writes:
+ tag4294967294:/tag
+
On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 23:38:24 +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 12:28:22PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Bill Allombert ballo...@debian.org writes:
+ tag4294967294:/tag
+ item
+ p
+ tt(uid_t)(-2) == (gid_t)(-2)/tt emmust
+
Bill Allombert ballo...@debian.org writes:
OK I offer an updated patch.
Third time's a charm I hope.
Looks good to me. Seconded.
--
Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 12:28:22PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Bill Allombert ballo...@debian.org writes:
+ tag4294967294:/tag
+ item
+ p
+ tt(uid_t)(-2) == (gid_t)(-2)/tt emmust
+ not/em be used, because it is mistaken for
+
On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 02:27:06PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 04:44:22PM +, Matthew Vernon wrote:
Here's a patch to document the 32-bit nature of UIDs, in line with Ben's
suggestion (which seems sound to me).
I miss the special case of 32-bit wide -2, aka
Bill Allombert ballo...@debian.org writes:
+ tag4294967294:/tag
+ item
+ p
+ tt(uid_t)(-2) == (gid_t)(-2)/tt emmust
+ not/em be used, because it is mistaken for
+ tt65534/tt prgnnobody/prgn by some
+
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 04:44:22PM +, Matthew Vernon wrote:
Here's a patch to document the 32-bit nature of UIDs, in line with Ben's
suggestion (which seems sound to me).
I miss the special case of 32-bit wide -2, aka nobody as used by nfs.
It should be reserved at least.
Bastian
--
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 10:20:00AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Matthew Vernon matt...@debian.org writes:
Here's a patch to document the 32-bit nature of UIDs, in line with Ben's
suggestion (which seems sound to me). I've added a note to the effect
that useradd won't use the higher-numbered
tags 765499 +patch
quit
Hi,
Here's a patch to document the 32-bit nature of UIDs, in line with Ben's
suggestion (which seems sound to me). I've added a note to the effect
that useradd won't use the higher-numbered UIDs, which seems sensible as
a) that requires no changes to useradd b) there are
Matthew Vernon matt...@debian.org writes:
Here's a patch to document the 32-bit nature of UIDs, in line with Ben's
suggestion (which seems sound to me). I've added a note to the effect
that useradd won't use the higher-numbered UIDs, which seems sensible as
a) that requires no changes to
Hi,
Matthew Vernon:
Here's a patch to document the 32-bit nature of UIDs, in line with Ben's
suggestion (which seems sound to me). I've added a note to the effect
that useradd won't use the higher-numbered UIDs, which seems sensible as
a) that requires no changes to useradd b) there are some
11 matches
Mail list logo
