On Tuesday 11 November 2014 00:17:59 Mike Hommey wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 12:06:30AM +0100, Ondrej Zary wrote:
(gdb) print JSC::MacroAssemblerX86Common::s_sseCheckState
$1 = JSC::MacroAssemblerX86Common::HasSSE3
Aha! At least now it's clear what part is doing wrong.
Can you compile
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 06:54:26PM +0100, Ondrej Zary wrote:
On Tuesday 11 November 2014 00:17:59 Mike Hommey wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 12:06:30AM +0100, Ondrej Zary wrote:
(gdb) print JSC::MacroAssemblerX86Common::s_sseCheckState
$1 = JSC::MacroAssemblerX86Common::HasSSE3
Aha!
On Tuesday 11 November 2014 23:43:29 Mike Hommey wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 06:54:26PM +0100, Ondrej Zary wrote:
On Tuesday 11 November 2014 00:17:59 Mike Hommey wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 12:06:30AM +0100, Ondrej Zary wrote:
(gdb) print
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 12:11:16AM +0100, Ondrej Zary wrote:
On Tuesday 11 November 2014 23:43:29 Mike Hommey wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 06:54:26PM +0100, Ondrej Zary wrote:
On Tuesday 11 November 2014 00:17:59 Mike Hommey wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 12:06:30AM +0100, Ondrej Zary
On Monday 10 November 2014 06:03:04 Mike Hommey wrote:
On Sun, Nov 09, 2014 at 08:30:58AM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote:
Okay, so despite all the changes in the related code, this was not
fixed. I now need to know if this is a bug in cpu detection or in the
code deciding what to JIT features to
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 09:25:50PM +0100, Ondrej Zary wrote:
On Monday 10 November 2014 06:03:04 Mike Hommey wrote:
On Sun, Nov 09, 2014 at 08:30:58AM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote:
Okay, so despite all the changes in the related code, this was not
fixed. I now need to know if this is a bug in
On Monday 10 November 2014 23:18:14 Mike Hommey wrote:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 09:25:50PM +0100, Ondrej Zary wrote:
On Monday 10 November 2014 06:03:04 Mike Hommey wrote:
On Sun, Nov 09, 2014 at 08:30:58AM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote:
Okay, so despite all the changes in the related code,
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 12:06:30AM +0100, Ondrej Zary wrote:
(gdb) print JSC::MacroAssemblerX86Common::s_sseCheckState
$1 = JSC::MacroAssemblerX86Common::HasSSE3
Aha! At least now it's clear what part is doing wrong.
Can you compile and run the following code, and give its output?
#include
On Sun, Nov 09, 2014 at 08:30:58AM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote:
Okay, so despite all the changes in the related code, this was not
fixed. I now need to know if this is a bug in cpu detection or in the
code deciding what to JIT features to enabled based on the cpu
detection.
In gdb, after the
On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 12:04:09AM +0100, Ondrej Zary wrote:
On Friday 07 November 2014 23:32:55 Mike Hommey wrote:
On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 09:24:23PM +0100, Ondrej Zary wrote:
Program received signal SIGILL, Illegal instruction.
[Switching to Thread 0xab7feb70 (LWP 7670)]
0xad42fbf2
On Saturday 08 November 2014 08:04:08 Mike Hommey wrote:
On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 12:04:09AM +0100, Ondrej Zary wrote:
On Friday 07 November 2014 23:32:55 Mike Hommey wrote:
On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 09:24:23PM +0100, Ondrej Zary wrote:
Program received signal SIGILL, Illegal instruction.
On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 01:22:04PM +0100, Ondrej Zary wrote:
On Saturday 08 November 2014 08:04:08 Mike Hommey wrote:
On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 12:04:09AM +0100, Ondrej Zary wrote:
On Friday 07 November 2014 23:32:55 Mike Hommey wrote:
On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 09:24:23PM +0100, Ondrej
On Thursday 06 November 2014 23:49:16 Mike Hommey wrote:
On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 08:04:22PM +0100, Ondrej Zary wrote:
Package: iceweasel
Version: 31.2.0esr-2~deb7u1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
after upgrading iceweasel:i386 24.8.1esr-1~deb7u1 to 31.2.0esr-2~deb7u1, it
does
On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 09:24:23PM +0100, Ondrej Zary wrote:
Program received signal SIGILL, Illegal instruction.
[Switching to Thread 0xab7feb70 (LWP 7670)]
0xad42fbf2 in ?? ()
(gdb) disassemble
No function contains program counter for selected frame.
(gdb)
Try disassemble 0xad42fbf2,+10
On Friday 07 November 2014 23:32:55 Mike Hommey wrote:
On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 09:24:23PM +0100, Ondrej Zary wrote:
Program received signal SIGILL, Illegal instruction.
[Switching to Thread 0xab7feb70 (LWP 7670)]
0xad42fbf2 in ?? ()
(gdb) disassemble
No function contains program counter
Package: iceweasel
Version: 31.2.0esr-2~deb7u1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
after upgrading iceweasel:i386 24.8.1esr-1~deb7u1 to 31.2.0esr-2~deb7u1, it
does not work anymore. It crashes immediately at startup with Illegal
instruction. In safe-mode, the application window appears but then
On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 08:04:22PM +0100, Ondrej Zary wrote:
Package: iceweasel
Version: 31.2.0esr-2~deb7u1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
after upgrading iceweasel:i386 24.8.1esr-1~deb7u1 to 31.2.0esr-2~deb7u1, it
does not work anymore. It crashes immediately at startup with Illegal
17 matches
Mail list logo
