Guillem Jover wrote:
> Ok, thanks for clarifying! One last question, there seems to be some
> discrepancy between the license stated in debian/copyright and the
> license blurb in the perl script. Would you sign off on the attached
> patch?
All code I've written in dpkg-repack is licensed under GP
Hi!
[ Hmm, I've only seen this now in the BTS, as it seems my spam filters
in master eat this email. :/ ]
On Sun, 2014-11-09 at 21:35:21 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> I don't want to maintain dpkg-repack upstream.
Ok, thanks for clarifying! One last question, there seems to be some
discrepancy bet
Guillem Jover wrote:
> Hey Joey!
>
> On Sat, 2014-11-08 at 01:24:55 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: normal
> > Control: affects -1 dpkg-repack
>
> > I'm planning on taking over dpkg-repack, with the intention of merging
> > it back into dpkg proper. And probably transi
Hey Joey!
On Sat, 2014-11-08 at 01:24:55 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: normal
> Control: affects -1 dpkg-repack
> I'm planning on taking over dpkg-repack, with the intention of merging
> it back into dpkg proper. And probably transition it to eventually
> something like
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Control: affects -1 dpkg-repack
Hi!
I'm planning on taking over dpkg-repack, with the intention of merging
it back into dpkg proper. And probably transition it to eventually
something like dpkg --archive or similar.
Thanks,
Guillem
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to de
5 matches
Mail list logo
