Bug#768600: Bug#769557: education-common: package fails to upgrade properly from wheezy

2014-12-05 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi Guillem, On Donnerstag, 4. Dezember 2014, Guillem Jover wrote: That's because that upgrade is still using dpkg 1.17.21, which does not force the upgrade of readahead-fedora, and then it's still using the old readahead-fedora 2:1.5.6-4 w/o the fix. No bug here, besides using old package

Bug#768600: Bug#769557: education-common: package fails to upgrade properly from wheezy

2014-12-04 Thread Holger Levsen
reopen 768600 found 768600 2:1.5.6-5.2 reassign 769557 readahea-fedora forcemerge 768600 769557 affect 768600 education-desktop-lxde affect 768600 education-desktop-sugar affect 768600 education-common affect 768600 education-desktop-xfce thanks On Sonntag, 23. November 2014, Petter Reinholdtsen

Bug#769557: education-common: package fails to upgrade properly from wheezy

2014-11-23 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi Don, On Sonntag, 23. November 2014, Don Armstrong wrote: is it accepted by bendel (lists.debian.org) And then it gets discarded by the mailing list because the message was too large. I think the limit is 200K, and that message exceeds it. ah, thanks. Did Lucas get a warning about this or

Bug#769557: education-common: package fails to upgrade properly from wheezy

2014-11-22 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
I suspect this metapackage upgrade problem was triggered by bug #768600 fixed in readahead-fedora version 2:1.5.6-5.2. If I got it right, it was a problem exposed/triggered by a new dpkg version changing how triggers were handled, and not really something we can fix in education-common. --

Bug#769557: education-common: package fails to upgrade properly from wheezy

2014-11-22 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi owner@bugs + listmasters, any idea why #769557 (Message-ID: 20141114122853.ga11...@xanadu.blop.info) wasn't send to debian-...@lists.debian.org? +thanks for all your work on keeping the infrastructure running so nicely 99,999% of the time! :-) signature.asc Description: This is a

Bug#769557: education-common: package fails to upgrade properly from wheezy

2014-11-22 Thread Don Armstrong
On Sun, 23 Nov 2014, Holger Levsen wrote: Hi owner@bugs + listmasters, any idea why #769557 (Message-ID: 20141114122853.ga11...@xanadu.blop.info) wasn't send to debian-...@lists.debian.org? Nov 14 12:46:12 s_local@bendel postfix/smtp[22501]: A9DE96F5: