Control: tag -1 confirmed
Adam D. Barratt (2014-12-01):
> I've unblocked 1:9.9.5.dfsg-6, but it'll need a d-i ack due to the udeb.
No objections.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Control: tags -1 + d-i
On 2014-11-28 7:58, Daniel Pocock wrote:
On 21/11/14 18:58, Niels Thykier wrote:
Any news on this upload? :)
~Niels
Hi LaMont,
I've prepared an NMU, the debdiff is attached and I am happy to upload
it if you like
I've unblocked 1:9.9.5.dfsg-6, but it'll need a d-i
On 21/11/14 18:58, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2014-11-17 23:43, LaMont Jones wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>> Again, without actually looking at it, I'm inclined to agree. 87k
>> lines this late in the process is too many.
>>
>> I'll get a patch together for 9.9.5, but it may be wednesday before I have
>> it
On 2014-11-17 23:43, LaMont Jones wrote:
> [...]
>
> Again, without actually looking at it, I'm inclined to agree. 87k
> lines this late in the process is too many.
>
> I'll get a patch together for 9.9.5, but it may be wednesday before I have
> it uploaded to sid, and a diff sent to you guys.
>
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 08:06:02PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
> In the particular case, it has been suggested that the final changes
> compared to testing will be 87 000 (or more) lines. Unless 97+% of this
> is pure documentational/auto-generated changes, which can be filtered
> out and turn thi
On 17/11/14 20:06, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2014-11-17 19:19, LaMont Jones wrote:
>> [...]
>> Generally speaking, I have found the fix-level updates to bind to be very
>> safe and sane, although sometimes they are somewhat large. I have not
>> looked at 9.9.6 yet, but I expect it's in the same
On 2014-11-17 19:19, LaMont Jones wrote:
> [...]
> Generally speaking, I have found the fix-level updates to bind to be very
> safe and sane, although sometimes they are somewhat large. I have not
> looked at 9.9.6 yet, but I expect it's in the same vein. It is rare to
> see them do anything in a
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 07:28:02PM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> testing currently has bind9 version 1:9.9.5.dfsg-5
>
> Upstream released 9.9.6 fixing some bugs with an impact on compatibility
> and at least one appears to be security related
> "Corrected bugs in the handling of wildcard records b
On Sun, November 16, 2014 17:01, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> On 16 November 2014 16:58:47 CET, Jonathan Wiltshire
>>Did you get any responses from elsewhere to this?
> Not yet, I'll follow up after the weekend. If no response, I'm happy to
> NMU the one line fix to copy the missing header into the de
On 16 November 2014 16:58:47 CET, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
>Control: tag -1 moreinfo
>
>On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 07:28:02PM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>> I understand the release team would usually prefer to see the one
>line
>> fix for debian/rules against the existing package and I'm happy to
>
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 07:28:02PM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> I understand the release team would usually prefer to see the one line
> fix for debian/rules against the existing package and I'm happy to NMU
> if the maintainers aren't able to provide that in the next cou
Package: release.debian.org
X-Debbugs-CC: secur...@debian.org,lam...@debian.org,mgilb...@debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
UserTags: unblock
testing currently has bind9 version 1:9.9.5.dfsg-5
Upstream released 9.9.6 fixing some bugs with an impact on compatibility
and at le
12 matches
Mail list logo
