Anthony Towns writes:
> The way it was done last time was:
That was to decide between two "final candidates" for one open
position. We now have 2 present and one pending (Colin's) open
positions, and have discussed the nominated list of candidates privately
as has been our custom.
I'd be happ
On Mon, 02 Mar 2015, Josh Triplett wrote:
> Wouldn't it make more sense to put all of the possible candidates on
> one ballot? If you put each on a separate ballot, what happens if
> there are more winners than available committee slots, or if current
> committee members want to express preferences
On 3 March 2015 at 10:02, Don Armstrong wrote:
> ===BEGIN
>
> The Technical Committee recommends that PERSON be appointment by the
>
"appointed"...
> Debian Project Leader to the Technical Committee.
>
> A: Recommend to Appoint PERSON
> B: Further Discussion
>
The way it was done last time
On Mon, 2 Mar 2015 16:02:19 -0800 Don Armstrong wrote:
> The following is a draft of the ballot which will be used to recommend
> new CTTE members to the DPL.
>
> ===BEGIN
>
> The Technical Committee recommends that PERSON be appointment by the
> Debian Project Leader to the Technical Committee.
The following is a draft of the ballot which will be used to recommend
new CTTE members to the DPL.
===BEGIN
The Technical Committee recommends that PERSON be appointment by the
Debian Project Leader to the Technical Committee.
A: Recommend to Appoint PERSON
B: Further Discussion
===END
Unless
5 matches
Mail list logo
