On 03/15/2017 03:45 AM, James Valleroy wrote: [...] > > One thing we might want to consider is splitting off optional Plinth > modules into separate *source* packages. That would allow some modules > to migrate to testing/stable, while others stay in unstable.
I second the idea to split into separate source packages at least for some applications and newer applications. > > Currently, it would be difficult to maintain separate upstream > repositories for each module though, because our module API is not > stable yet. During the period API is not stable, we could use a strong Depends: and Breaks: headers and upload all packages at the same time. Once the API stabilizes (or during period API is not broken) we can do independent updates. In addition, I also suggest that we rename the plinth and/or plinth applications to "freedombox-APP" or "freedombox-ui-APP". This is to have good ability to discover these packages by users and also have also good branding. "plinth" is not a very useful image we want to put into people's heads. -- Sunil
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
