Bug#772190: Debian bug reports for aufs-utils

2016-09-14 Thread J. R. Okajima
"J. R. Okajima": > I don't think these are bugs since they are following "Dashism" instead > of "Bashism." I understand that debian has a policy to be ::: It may not be important anymore, but I've just found that I was confusing. And I think it may be better to post again. For "echo \t"

Bug#772190: Debian bug reports for aufs-utils

2016-09-12 Thread J. R. Okajima
Jan Luca Naumann: > Both reported problems seem not to be fixed in the current version yet > so you want to fix them maybe :-) Thanx lettng me know. I didn't know that. I don't think these are bugs since they are following "Dashism" instead of "Bashism." I understand that debian has a policy to

Bug#772190: Debian bug reports for aufs-utils

2016-09-12 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
Hey, in Debian there are two open bugs for aufs-utils that belongs to the upstream code: 1. https://bugs.debian.org/772190 2. https://bugs.debian.org/777559 (contains patch) Both reported problems seem not to be fixed in the current version yet so you want to fix them maybe :-) Best regards,