Norbert Preining writes:
> On Tue, 30 Dec 2014, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
>> I guess this clarifies the doubt regarding prior-version in maintscript.
>
> Indeed, sorry for not checking it myself ...
No problem :-).
--
Vasudev Kamath
http://copyninja.info
Connect on ~friendica: copyni...@samsargik
On Tue, 30 Dec 2014, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
> I guess this clarifies the doubt regarding prior-version in maintscript.
Indeed, sorry for not checking it myself ...
Norbert
PREINING, Norbert http
Norbert Preining writes:
> Hi again
>
> not recommended but didn't wanted to
> create multiple commits of related changes.
>
>
> ok, not my favorite but probably ok for debian-fonts policy.
Well there isn't any policy, I do this because I generate changelog from
git dch command and
Hi again
> not recommended but didn't wanted to
> create multiple commits of related changes.
ok, not my favorite but probably ok for debian-fonts policy.
> But actually, we are renaming conffile in -6 so this should be -6~
> right?. I re-read that paragraph
>
> "For example, for a conffile re
Jonas Smedegaard writes:
> Quoting Vasudev Kamath (2014-12-29 07:13:34)
>> Norbert Preining writes:
>>
>> > On Sun, 28 Dec 2014, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
>> >> I've prepared the package and updated maintscript file to handle now
>> >> obsolete 65-droid-sans-fallback.conf file removal.
>> >
>> > Hm
Quoting Vasudev Kamath (2014-12-29 07:13:34)
> Norbert Preining writes:
>
> > On Sun, 28 Dec 2014, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
> >> I've prepared the package and updated maintscript file to handle now
> >> obsolete 65-droid-sans-fallback.conf file removal.
> >
> > Hmm, something is funny here ... build
Norbert Preining writes:
> On Mon, 29 Dec 2014, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
>> I've included mv_conffile change you suggested and changes
>> reflected back in git. And piuparts test shows no obsolete files left
>> back which is good :).
>
> Hmm, did you rewrite the history of the git repo? Pulling into
On Sun, 28 Dec 2014 20:10:16 +0530
Vasudev Kamath wrote:
> > Indeed it is not ... should be 69 ;-)
>
> Is it sufficient just to increase the priority from 65 to 69? or
> something else needs to be changed to fix this?.
Thanks! :)
fontconfig design is... well, a bit strange and it sometimes co
On Mon, 29 Dec 2014, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
> I've included mv_conffile change you suggested and changes
> reflected back in git. And piuparts test shows no obsolete files left
> back which is good :).
Hmm, did you rewrite the history of the git repo? Pulling into master
suddently gives merge confl
Norbert Preining writes:
> On Mon, 29 Dec 2014, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
>> It looks like Christian introduced these changes to close the
>> bug#762296, I think the error message comes second time when the cd is
>> executed in for loop. It still works because with first cd we are
>> already inside t
On Mon, 29 Dec 2014, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
> It looks like Christian introduced these changes to close the
> bug#762296, I think the error message comes second time when the cd is
> executed in for loop. It still works because with first cd we are
> already inside the directory where fonts are pres
Norbert Preining writes:
> On Sun, 28 Dec 2014, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
>> I've prepared the package and updated maintscript file to handle now
>> obsolete 65-droid-sans-fallback.conf file removal.
>
> Hmm, something is funny here ... building the package I see:
>
> for f in DroidSansFallback.ttf D
Norbert Preining writes:
> On Sun, 28 Dec 2014, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
>> I've prepared the package and updated maintscript file to handle now
>> obsolete 65-droid-sans-fallback.conf file removal.
>
> But I have added this already, shouldn't it be
> mv_conffile
> instead of rm_conffile and
On Sun, 28 Dec 2014, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
> I've prepared the package and updated maintscript file to handle now
> obsolete 65-droid-sans-fallback.conf file removal.
Hmm, something is funny here ... building the package I see:
for f in DroidSansFallback.ttf DroidSansFallbackLegacy.ttf ; \
do \
On Sun, 28 Dec 2014, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
> I've prepared the package and updated maintscript file to handle now
> obsolete 65-droid-sans-fallback.conf file removal.
But I have added this already, shouldn't it be
mv_conffile
instead of rm_conffile and adding a new? Otherwise changes in t
Quoting Vasudev Kamath (vasu...@copyninja.info):
> Updated package is kept in unreleased state in pkg-fonts git repository
> so its upload won't be missed.
>
> [*] https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-fonts/fonts-android.git
I built the package and sent the pre-approval request
signature.
Vasudev Kamath writes:
> Hi Norbert,
>
> Norbert Preining writes:
>
>> On Sun, 28 Dec 2014, Norbert Preining wrote:
>>> I am not sure if 61 is the right place, though.
>>
>> Indeed it is not ... should be 69 ;-)
>
> Is it sufficient just to increase the priority from 65 to 69? or
> something el
17 matches
Mail list logo
