Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org writes:
(Currently looking at flagged mails/proposed patches.)
Steve McIntyre st...@einval.com (2015-06-02):
Looks good to me...
Steve, Philip, feel free to push/upload as/when you see fit.
Done.
So, should we actually not close the bug, or open a new one
(Currently looking at flagged mails/proposed patches.)
Steve McIntyre st...@einval.com (2015-06-02):
Looks good to me...
Steve, Philip, feel free to push/upload as/when you see fit.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 12:54:32PM +0100, Philip Hands wrote:
As mentioned in the original report, the *boot? devices apparently
read-only and as such should not be in the list in the first place, so
this fix masks the presumed bug in parted_devices.c:process_device
I don't suppose that it really
As mentioned in the original report, the *boot? devices apparently
read-only and as such should not be in the list in the first place, so
this fix masks the presumed bug in parted_devices.c:process_device
I don't suppose that it really matters though, since we'll just be left
filtering out a
4 matches
Mail list logo