Hi Rogério
I would really appreciate if you keep usbmount alive.
The idea of a small tool to daemonize mount sounds interesting, but this
is one point where I am not sure. I've read an article about udev, where
it was stated, that udev should not start a daemon directly, but should
use systemd t
Dear Rogério,
I would simply say go ahead with your plan. If you are able to resolve
the issues with a new release, then nothing like it. I am already
subscribed to the package in case a new one comes out :)
Although at my end, it is also ntfs which shows the same problem as
external usb-hdd.
Til
Hi, Mathieu.
On Jul 16 2015, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 10:38 PM, Rogério Brito wrote:
> > BTW, one very important question: are the problems with usbmount only
> > apparent when using fuse filesystems or are they also apparent when using
> > filesystems supported by the k
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 10:38 PM, Rogério Brito wrote:
> BTW, one very important question: are the problems with usbmount only
> apparent when using fuse filesystems or are they also apparent when using
> filesystems supported by the kernel (e.g., vfat or ext4)?
>
>
vfat & ext4 usbkey were ok for
Hi.
On Jul 08 2015, jean-marc montanier wrote:
> Just a quick message to report that the nasty workaround is anyway
> efficient. It's working on my Jessie, thanks.
The basic idea behind using at is not that bad at all.
I have investigated (a very tiny bit) of the behavior of fuse mounts and the
Hi,
Just a quick message to report that the nasty workaround is anyway
efficient. It's working on my Jessie, thanks.
If udisks2 is covering the functionalities of usbmount and has an active
development, may be the usbmount package should be removed from the future
versions of debian ?
Jean-Marc
6 matches
Mail list logo
