On 02/25/2015 07:57 AM, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2015-02-25 07:53, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> On 02/23/2015 10:29 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
>>> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>>>
>>> On 2014-12-30 12:29, Matthias Klose wrote:
forgot to mention that there are no regression in the binutils testsuite
>
On 2015-02-25 07:53, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 02/23/2015 10:29 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>>
>> On 2014-12-30 12:29, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>> forgot to mention that there are no regression in the binutils testsuite on
>>> all
>>> release architectures, and that there
On 02/23/2015 10:29 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
> On 2014-12-30 12:29, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> forgot to mention that there are no regression in the binutils testsuite on
>> all
>> release architectures, and that there are no regression in the gcc-4.8 and
>> gcc-4.9 te
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On 2014-12-30 12:29, Matthias Klose wrote:
> forgot to mention that there are no regression in the binutils testsuite on
> all
> release architectures, and that there are no regression in the gcc-4.8 and
> gcc-4.9 testsuites on all release architectures.
>
>
Hi Matthi
Hi guys,
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17512 is still growing,
and porting all the patches to 2.24.90.20141023-1 is getting less and less
trivial. If you short the distance with the upstream version, that will put a
lot of work of the security-team off :)
Thanks for your w
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 12:29:35PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> forgot to mention that there are no regression in the binutils testsuite on
> all
> release architectures, and that there are no regression in the gcc-4.8 and
> gcc-4.9 testsuites on all release architectures.
Did someone from the
On 12/30/2014 01:43 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 12/30/2014 01:27 PM, Alexander Cherepanov wrote:
>> On 2014-12-30 14:05, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>> - several fixes for CVE issues, the security team asked to include these
>>> into jessie.
>>> - CVE-2014-8484 (PR binutils/17509).
>>>
On 12/30/2014 01:27 PM, Alexander Cherepanov wrote:
> On 2014-12-30 14:05, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> - several fixes for CVE issues, the security team asked to include these
>> into jessie.
>> - CVE-2014-8484 (PR binutils/17509).
>> - CVE-2014-8485, CVE-2014-8504 (PR binutils/17510).
On 2014-12-30 14:05, Matthias Klose wrote:
- several fixes for CVE issues, the security team asked to include these
into jessie.
- CVE-2014-8484 (PR binutils/17509).
- CVE-2014-8485, CVE-2014-8504 (PR binutils/17510).
- CVE-2014-8501, CVE-2014-8502, CVE-2014-8503 (PR binutils
forgot to mention that there are no regression in the binutils testsuite on all
release architectures, and that there are no regression in the gcc-4.8 and
gcc-4.9 testsuites on all release architectures.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "uns
Package: release.debian.org
Tags: sid jessie
please grant a freeze exception for binutils 2.25-3 in jessie. The current
version in jessie is built from the 2.25 release branch, and this update would
move the final 2.25 into jessie. The package probably has more changes than
needed, otoh it fixes
11 matches
Mail list logo
