Hi Sam,
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 01:24:05PM +, Sam Hartman wrote:
> I'm sorry.
> I thought I had responded long ago on this, but apparently not.
> I think the package split makes sense.
I finally got a chance to give this kpropd package split a whirl.
Attached is my first take on a patch.
I'm sorry.
I thought I had responded long ago on this, but apparently not.
I think the package split makes sense.
On Tue, 13 Oct 2015, Michael Weiser wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> > Looking at the patch, it feels awkward to manually install the unit file
> > and sysv script to the staging directory. If we created a new
> > krb5-kpropd package to be installed only on slave KDCs, then we could
> > benefit from the
Hi Ben,
> Looking at the patch, it feels awkward to manually install the unit file
> and sysv script to the staging directory. If we created a new
> krb5-kpropd package to be installed only on slave KDCs, then we could
> benefit from the debian/packagename.init magic and also have the script
>
Looking at the patch, it feels awkward to manually install the unit file
and sysv script to the staging directory. If we created a new krb5-kpropd
package to be installed only on slave KDCs, then we could benefit from the
debian/packagename.init magic and also have the script be active by
5 matches
Mail list logo
