On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 10:35:38AM +0800, Steven Capper
wrote:
> Hi,
> arm64 should be building in -5, so shouldn't the arm64 reverse
> dependancies be unaffected?
> Under mips, mipsel, and s390x tbb fails to build unit tests due to
> missing/incorrect gcc atomics. I have very little confidence i
Hi,
arm64 should be building in -5, so shouldn't the arm64 reverse
dependancies be unaffected?
Under mips, mipsel, and s390x tbb fails to build unit tests due to
missing/incorrect gcc atomics. I have very little confidence in the
functional correctness of the reverse dependencies, so I would be
inc
Hi all,
Le 2015-01-16 23:37, Jonathan Wiltshire a écrit :
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 03:03:08PM +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
Please unblock package tbb
It fixes two grave bugs: #756233 & #762656
It also fixes a longer term issue, as depicted in comment: #775263#17
So
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 03:03:08PM +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> Please unblock package tbb
>
> It fixes two grave bugs: #756233 & #762656
> It also fixes a longer term issue, as depicted in comment: #775263#17
> So I understand the debdiff may be a little long, but u
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package tbb
It fixes two grave bugs: #756233 & #762656
It also fixes a longer term issue, as depicted in comment: #775263#17
So I understand the debdiff may be a little long,
5 matches
Mail list logo