On Tue, 2015-08-18 at 22:51 +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > I'll look into it soon, hopefully this weekend.
>
> Any update? If not, it might be best to apply Tim's patch for now.
DebConf15 has been awesome and taking most of the time. :-)
I did apply the patch and run some quick tests. While
* Ritesh Raj Sarraf [2015-08-04 17:32]:
> > Anything new? GCC 5 is in unstable, so this is somewhat urgent.
>
> I'll look into it soon, hopefully this weekend.
Any update? If not, it might be best to apply Tim's patch for now.
--
Martin Michlmayr
Linux for HP Helion, Hewlett-Packard
On Mon, 2015-08-03 at 16:39 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Jul 2015 11:58:47 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
>
> > > Hi there. Here’s a quick patch to fix the gcc5 build failures
> for the ioapps package. Since upstream appears to be unmaintained
> and doesn’t use autoconf I’m prop
On Thu, 16 Jul 2015 11:58:47 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> > Hi there. Here’s a quick patch to fix the gcc5 build failures for the
> > ioapps package. Since upstream appears to be unmaintained and doesn’t use
> > autoconf I’m proposing a patch to modify the Makefile directly.
> > Patch is
On Thursday 16 July 2015 08:29 AM, Potter, Tim (Cloud Services) wrote:
> tags 777916 + patch
> thanks
>
> Hi there. Here’s a quick patch to fix the gcc5 build failures for the ioapps
> package. Since upstream appears to be unmaintained and doesn’t use autoconf
> I’m proposing a patch to modify
tags 777916 + patch
thanks
Hi there. Here’s a quick patch to fix the gcc5 build failures for the ioapps
package. Since upstream appears to be unmaintained and doesn’t use autoconf
I’m proposing a patch to modify the Makefile directly.
Patch is attached which appends “-std=gnu89” flag to the C
6 matches
Mail list logo
