On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 02:31:55PM +0800, YunQiang Su wrote:
> Any progress of this bug?
> It blocks some packages in to build for mips64el port.
I'm part way through upgrading to the latest upstream version.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, 13 Aug 2015 10:10:09 -0600 Brett Johnson wrote:
> On 08/13/2015 09:51 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Who would I submit a patch for the packaging to?!
>
> Lol. Sorry, I didn't notice you were the maintainer ;)
Any progress of this bug?
It blocks some packages in to build for
tag 778180 - patch
kthxbye
--- xemacs21-21.4.22.orig/configure.in
+++ xemacs21-21.4.22/configure.in
@@ -1941,6 +1941,8 @@ if test $cflags_specified = no; then
CFLAGS=-g -O3 -Wall -Wno-switch -Winline -Wmissing-prototypes
dnl Yuck, bad compares have been worth at least 3 crashes!
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 03:57:40PM -0600, Brett Johnson wrote:
gcc5 changes the semantics of inline function declarations, causing some
inline functions in xemacs to be considered extern, and thus cause
In what way does it change the semantics - this seems like a very
surprising and
On 08/13/2015 09:51 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
Who would I submit a patch for the packaging to?!
Lol. Sorry, I didn't notice you were the maintainer ;)
--
Brett Johnson br...@hp.com
On 08/13/2015 05:51 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 03:57:40PM -0600, Brett Johnson wrote:
gcc5 changes the semantics of inline function declarations, causing some
inline functions in xemacs to be considered extern, and thus cause
In what way does it change the semantics -
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 11:33:36AM -0400, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Mark Brown broo...@debian.org [2015-08-13 12:51]:
gcc5 changes the semantics of inline function declarations, causing some
inline functions in xemacs to be considered extern, and thus cause
In what way does it change the
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 09:39:09AM -0600, Brett Johnson wrote:
I agree that it would be better to make the change in the packaging,
rather than in configure.in. If you've already done this, would you
mind submitting a patch?
Who would I submit a patch for the packaging to?!
signature.asc
* Mark Brown broo...@debian.org [2015-08-13 12:51]:
gcc5 changes the semantics of inline function declarations, causing some
inline functions in xemacs to be considered extern, and thus cause
In what way does it change the semantics - this seems like a very
surprising and counterintuitive
tags 778180 +patch
thanks
gcc5 changes the semantics of inline function declarations, causing some
inline functions in xemacs to be considered extern, and thus cause
multiple function definitions for the linker. This should be fixed
upstream, but for now we can add -fgnu89-inline to CFLAGS to
tags 778180 +patch
thanks
The stddef.h header defines max_align_t conditional on the definition
of __STDC_VERSION__, so in gcc5, this type is defined in stddef.h,
where for older versions of gcc it was not.
Note that applying this patch makes visible other gcc5 problems with
new inline function
11 matches
Mail list logo