Control: tag -1 confirmed
Wouter Verhelst (2015-03-05):
> On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 05:28:29AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Was installation over nbd tested with latest nbd-client-udeb in d-i? I'd
> > rather avoid chasing a possible regression because I let stuff in that's
> > really late.
>
On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 09:35:04AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Yeah, I know nbd has to be specifically required/set up for that to be
> used at all. I probably should learn how to test that myself,
FYI, it's really not all that hard:
# create a 10G sparse file:
dd if=/dev/zero of=/srv/nbd/fil
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 05:28:29AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Was installation over nbd tested with latest nbd-client-udeb in d-i? I'd
> rather avoid chasing a possible regression because I let stuff in that's
> really late.
As I said on IRC just now: I did a test earlier today, and it s
Wouter Verhelst (2015-03-05):
> Not with 3.8-4, but I do believe I did a test with 3.8-3 (although
> it's been a while)
>
> I'll test again later today, just to be sure (have to go to work now).
OK, great.
> Fair enough. I doubt it's going to have any influence on d-i at all
> (nbd-client-udeb
On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 05:28:29AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi Wouter,
>
> Wouter Verhelst (2015-02-21):
> > Please unblock package nbd
> >
> > I had uploaded it way back in october, around the freeze, and had
> > thought that it had migrated. Yesterday, I noticed (to my surprise) that
>
Hi Wouter,
Wouter Verhelst (2015-02-21):
> Please unblock package nbd
>
> I had uploaded it way back in october, around the freeze, and had
> thought that it had migrated. Yesterday, I noticed (to my surprise) that
> this did not happen. I suppose I should've paid more attention.
Well: that + 1
Mehdi Dogguy (2015-02-28):
> On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 09:13:51AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst
> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks. Do I need to do anything for that, or was the tag all that's
> > needed?
> >
>
> No further actions are required. KiBi looks at d-i tagged bugs every
> few days and acks/nacks their
On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 09:13:51AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>
> Thanks. Do I need to do anything for that, or was the tag all that's
> needed?
>
No further actions are required. KiBi looks at d-i tagged bugs every
few days and acks/nacks their unblock. When that's done, we add the
necessary
On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 02:58:13AM +0100, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + d-i - moreinfo
>
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 09:24:20PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst
> wrote:
> > retitle 778919 unblock: nbd/1:3.8-4
> > thanks
> >
> > On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 07:02:00PM +0100, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> > >
Control: tags -1 + d-i - moreinfo
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 09:24:20PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> retitle 778919 unblock: nbd/1:3.8-4
> thanks
>
> On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 07:02:00PM +0100, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 08:43:27PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst
> > wrote:
> > >
>
retitle 778919 unblock: nbd/1:3.8-4
thanks
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 07:02:00PM +0100, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 08:43:27PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst
> wrote:
> >
> > If you prefer, I can do another upload with the junk removed. Either
> > way works for me.
> >
>
> That would be
On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 08:43:27PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst
wrote:
>
> If you prefer, I can do another upload with the junk removed. Either
> way works for me.
>
That would be nice, yes. And will saves us time during the
review. Thanks.
--
Mehdi Dogguy
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs
12 matches
Mail list logo
