On 2015-03-14 13:27, Herbert Parentes Fortes Neto (hpfn) wrote:
It would be nice if you do the upload. I belive it would be
faster to close the bug.
OK, uploaded to experimental.
Andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
On Fri, 13 Mar 2015 22:24:13 +0100
Andreas Beckmann a...@debian.org wrote:
On 2015-03-13 22:00, Herbert Parentes Fortes Neto (hpfn) wrote:
Thanks for checking the package.
Looks good now! Do you need a sponsor to upload this?
It would be nice if you do the upload. I belive it would be
Hi,
Thanks for checking the package.
And sorry about the delay. problems doing the upload.
continue
On Fri, 13 Mar 2015 14:28:45 +0100
Andreas Beckmann a...@debian.org wrote:
Hi,
maybe it's even time to remove the old transitional libgphoto2-2-dev
package? (libsane-dev seems to be the
On 2015-03-13 22:00, Herbert Parentes Fortes Neto (hpfn) wrote:
Thanks for checking the package.
Looks good now! Do you need a sponsor to upload this?
Andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On 2015-03-12 20:33, Herbert Parentes Fortes Neto (hpfn) wrote:
I made the new debian package. 2.5.7-2. And uploaded to mentors.
No transitional package.
Can you take a look ?
link: http://mentors.debian.net/package/libgphoto2
diff looks good, minor nitpicking:
+ * fix wrong trasitional
Hi,
maybe it's even time to remove the old transitional libgphoto2-2-dev
package? (libsane-dev seems to be the only package still having a
dependency on the old transitional one)
Andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Hi Guillem,
On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 00:59:54 +0100
Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org wrote:
Package: libgphoto2-port10
Version: 2.5.7-1
Severity: serious
Hi!
The new version in experimental, has turned the libgphoto2-port10 into
a transitional package for libgphoto2-port12 (w/o any
Hi Andreas,
On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 08:16:51 +0100
Andreas Beckmann a...@debian.org wrote:
On 2015-03-12 06:53, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
Package: libgphoto2-port12
Architecture: any
Multi-Arch: same
Breaks: libgphoto2-port10 ( 2.5.5)
Replaces: libgphoto2-port10 ( 2.5.5)
I don't think
On 2015-03-12 06:53, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
Package: libgphoto2-port12
Architecture: any
Multi-Arch: same
Breaks: libgphoto2-port10 ( 2.5.5)
Replaces: libgphoto2-port10 ( 2.5.5)
I don't think these Breaks+Replaces are needed at all, the filelist
(except for the wrong symlink) does not
Followup-For: Bug #780240
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'sid' to 'experimental'.
It installed fine in 'sid', then the upgrade to 'experimental' fails
because it tries to overwrite other packages files without declaring a
Breaks+Replaces relation.
Hi Andreas,
On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 22:01:34 +0100
Andreas Beckmann a...@debian.org wrote:
Followup-For: Bug #780240
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'sid' to 'experimental'.
It installed fine in 'sid', then the upgrade to 'experimental' fails
On Wed, 2015-03-11 at 15:22:14 -0300, Herbert Parentes Fortes Neto wrote:
On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 00:59:54 +0100 Guillem Jover wrote:
Package: libgphoto2-port10
Version: 2.5.7-1
Severity: serious
The new version in experimental, has turned the libgphoto2-port10 into
a transitional package
On 2015-03-11 22:20, Herbert Parentes Fortes Neto (hpfn) wrote:
There must not be a libgphoto2_port.so.10 symlink in the libgphoto2-port12
package.
Why ? It was important when I did the tests.
Then something is seriously borked in your package.
The new library is not a valid replacement
On 2015-03-12 05:24, Herbert Parentes Fortes Neto (hpfn) wrote:
Ok, digikam shows the photos on the celular(probably get confusing here),
but if you ask to import a select photo, it dies. That's enough.
I have doubts now. Check the steps:
At debian/control:
Package: libgphoto2-port12
Ok, digikam shows the photos on the celular(probably get confusing here),
but if you ask to import a select photo, it dies. That's enough.
I have doubts now. Check the steps:
At debian/control:
Package: libgphoto2-port12
Architecture: any
Multi-Arch: same
Breaks: libgphoto2-port10 ( 2.5.5)
Package: libgphoto2-port10
Version: 2.5.7-1
Severity: serious
Hi!
The new version in experimental, has turned the libgphoto2-port10 into
a transitional package for libgphoto2-port12 (w/o any rationale on the
debian/changelog nor in debian/rules, nor any commit message as the git
repo does not
16 matches
Mail list logo
