Bug#780430: qtwebkit-opensource-src: port to m68k

On 01/09/2018 04:45 PM, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: On Sat, Nov 04, 2017 at 01:21:40PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: Attaching an updated patch for 5.9.1+dfsg-5, please apply. I will try to upstream everything next week. Did you manage to send your patches upstream? If yes, can you give

Bug#780430: qtwebkit-opensource-src: port to m68k

Hi Adrian, On Sat, Nov 04, 2017 at 01:21:40PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Attaching an updated patch for 5.9.1+dfsg-5, please apply. > > I will try to upstream everything next week. Did you manage to send your patches upstream? If yes, can you give us a bug number or any other

Bug#780430: qtwebkit-opensource-src: port to m68k

Source: qtwebkit-opensource-src Version: 5.9.1+dfsg-5 Followup-For: Bug #780430 User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: m68k Hi! Attaching an updated patch for 5.9.1+dfsg-5, please apply. I will try to upstream everything next week. Thanks, Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz :

Bug#780430: qtwebkit-opensource-src: port to m68k

Control: version 5.212.0~alpha2-5 On 11/04/2017 01:21 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Attaching an updated patch for 5.9.1+dfsg-5, please apply. Oops, I mean 5.212.0~alpha2-5, of course. Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `'

Bug#780430: qtwebkit-opensource-src: port to m68k

On Sep 11 2017, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Because m68k has a default alignment of 16-bit, not 32-bit. Hence sizes of > structs often differ. It's part of the SysV ABI on Linux/m68k. Actually, the SysV ABI for m68k defines a 4-byte alignment for int, but

Bug#780430: qtwebkit-opensource-src: port to m68k

On 09/11/2017 03:02 PM, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: Patch in this bug no longer applies to the new version. Patch from webkit2gtk package [2] applies with a slight change, but I still do not like the special casing of struct sizes. Why are the sizes different on m68k? Because m68k has a default

Bug#780430: qtwebkit-opensource-src: port to m68k

Hi Adrian! On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 04:02:50PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On 10/17/2016 04:00 PM, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > > Correction: no, I can't forward it to *my* upstream: QtWebkit is not > > developed > > anymore. > > > > It needs to be accepted by

Bug#780430: qtwebkit-opensource-src: port to m68k

On Okt 17 2016, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > If Andreas agrees, I'm happy to forward his patch. Please do. Thanks, Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for

Bug#780430: qtwebkit-opensource-src: port to m68k

On 10/17/2016 04:00 PM, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > Correction: no, I can't forward it to *my* upstream: QtWebkit is not > developed > anymore. > > It needs to be accepted by WebKit developers. I don't have the time for this, > so please feel free to do it. Ah, interesting. I

Bug#780430: qtwebkit-opensource-src: port to m68k

On lunes, 17 de octubre de 2016 3:20:49 P. M. ART John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Hi Andreas! > > On 10/16/2016 11:54 PM, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > >> Attaching an updated patch by Andreas Schwab (CC'ed)> . > > > > Andreas: did you made the patch? Has it been submitted

Bug#780430: qtwebkit-opensource-src: port to m68k

Hi Andreas! On 10/16/2016 11:54 PM, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: >> Attaching an updated patch by Andreas Schwab (CC'ed)> . > > Andreas: did you made the patch? Has it been submitted upstream? What's the > license for it? I can't just blindy apply it without that info. Could you

Bug#780430: qtwebkit-opensource-src: port to m68k

On domingo, 16 de octubre de 2016 10:05:30 P. M. ART Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer dixit: > >Andreas: did you made the patch? Has it been submitted upstream? What's the > >license for it? I can't just blindy apply it without that info. > > Patches usually share the

Bug#780430: qtwebkit-opensource-src: port to m68k

Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer dixit: >Andreas: did you made the patch? Has it been submitted upstream? What's the >license for it? I can't just blindy apply it without that info. Patches usually share the licence of the patched files; as it is, there’s nothing copyright-relevant in it

Bug#780430: qtwebkit-opensource-src: port to m68k

tag 780430 moreinfo thanks On viernes, 14 de octubre de 2016 4:25:14 P. M. ART John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Hi! > > Attaching an updated patch by Andreas Schwab (CC'ed)> . Andreas: did you made the patch? Has it been submitted upstream? What's the license for it? I can't just blindy

Bug#780430: qtwebkit-opensource-src: port to m68k

Hi! Attaching an updated patch by Andreas Schwab (CC'ed). I haven't tested the patch yet besides the fact that it applies cleanly to the 5.6.1 package currently in Debian unstable. However, I will test the patch over the weekend. It just takes some time to build the package on m68k. Could we

Bug#780430: qtwebkit-opensource-src: port to m68k

Source: qtwebkit-opensource-src Version: 5.4.2+dfsg-2 Followup-For: Bug #780430 Hi Lisandro, please remember submitters don’t get bugmail… or ping them ;) Anyway, here you are: - We need the original author of the patches. The patches were written by myself. - We need the original author to

Bug#780430: qtwebkit-opensource-src: port to m68k

On Friday 13 March 2015 19:54:31 Thorsten Glaser wrote: Source: qtwebkit-opensource-src Version: 5.3.2+dfsg-3 Severity: important Tags: patch Hi, qtwebkit-opensource-src FTBFS on m68k due to 2 issues: • double-conversion – fix included, but will no longer be needed once it uses

Bug#780430: qtwebkit-opensource-src: port to m68k

Source: qtwebkit-opensource-src Version: 5.3.2+dfsg-3 Severity: important Tags: patch Hi, qtwebkit-opensource-src FTBFS on m68k due to 2 issues: • double-conversion – fix included, but will no longer be needed once it uses the system-wide copy • implicit alignment assumptions – fix included