On 09/04/15 09:43, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
> On 04.09.2015 10:38, Harald Dunkel wrote:
>> bind9 9.10 rc2 appears to be in experimental for >1y.
>> Its not set to RFH or RFA, #781739 doesn't tell, so I
>> wonder what is wrong with upstreams current version?
>
> too old, DNSSEC got added later AIUI.
>
On 04.09.2015 10:38, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> AFAICS softhsm2 is available since last week.
ok, a new source package, missed that.
> bind9 9.10 rc2 appears to be in experimental for >1y.
> Its not set to RFH or RFA, #781739 doesn't tell, so I
> wonder what is wrong with upstreams current version?
AFAICS softhsm2 is available since last week.
bind9 9.10 rc2 appears to be in experimental for >1y.
Its not set to RFH or RFA, #781739 doesn't tell, so I
wonder what is wrong with upstreams current version?
Since bind support in freeipa is optional, maybe its
possible to drop it? Without dhcp/sla
On 03.09.2015 14:24, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> I would be highly interested, too. It hurts to see Debian
> and Ubuntu fell behind on opensource identity management
> services.
still missing dependencies:
dogtag 10.2.6 (in git, doesn't work properly yet)
BIND 9.10.x
softhsm 2.0
then there's also ong
4 matches
Mail list logo
