On Tue, 2015-08-11 at 07:53 -0300, Mauricio Faria de Oliveira wrote:
Sure, thanks.
BTW, Hannes authored himself a patch like the one proposed [1], but
it
seems not posted to dm-devel (I didn't notice it earlier). I'd
expect
this to give some reassurance that something like it is more
Hi Ritesh,
On 08/10/2015 09:04 AM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
I'll look into this soon. But lowering the severity because, from the
description, it is again specific to one family of controllers.
This week, I intend to work on both the patches.
Sure, thanks.
BTW, Hannes authored himself a
Control: severity -1 important
HI Mauricio,
On Mon, 2015-06-22 at 08:33 -0300, Mauricio Faria de Oliveira wrote:
On 06/21/2015 06:16 AM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
Given that mulitpath doesn't do a release very often, I plan on
rebasing
on the latest git repo (which includes many of
Hi Ritesh,
On 06/21/2015 06:16 AM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
Given that mulitpath doesn't do a release very often, I plan on rebasing
on the latest git repo (which includes many of Hannes' fixes). They only
reason I'm procrastinating is because neither of our patches have been
accepted/pushed by
On Thursday 28 May 2015 05:31 PM, Mauricio Faria de Oliveira wrote:
These days I don't work on storage, i.e. don't have a team that spends
the time on these tools. So I keep the upstream first policy, for now.
Even my patch (kpartx) is very trivial but 've put it on hold until
Christoph
On Thursday 28 May 2015 12:37 AM, Mauricio Faria de Oliveira wrote:
Thanks!
Do you think it would be a problem to include the patch?
As explained the commit message, I think it's an obvious fix for the
regression introduced (with 'chomp', or similar name) for the case
when the sysfs
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 12:21 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
No. It has nothing to do with the patch.
These days I don't work on storage, i.e. don't have a team that spends
the time on these tools. So I keep the upstream first policy, for now.
Even my patch (kpartx) is very trivial but 've
On Wednesday 22 April 2015 05:12 PM, Mauricio Faria de Oliveira wrote:
Hey Ritesh,
On 04/21/2015 10:23 AM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
Is this been merged upstream ?
No, I haven't seen any reply to it on dm-devel nor commits.
I have the impression there's some delay between those 2 points.
Hi Ritesh,
On Wed, 2015-05-27 at 23:40 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
OKay!! THanks. I'll put this one on hold then. The other one, is already
ready for Unstable. And as I write, I'm also preparing the same for
Jessie+U1.
Thanks!
Do you think it would be a problem to include the patch?
As
Hey Ritesh,
On 04/21/2015 10:23 AM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
Is this been merged upstream ?
No, I haven't seen any reply to it on dm-devel nor commits.
I have the impression there's some delay between those 2 points.
I just pinged Hannes on the mailing list, in case he has some time
to
On Monday 13 April 2015 05:52 AM, Mauricio Faria de Oliveira wrote:
Oops, please use this version (-v2).
When the forwarded patch is applied in the source package, the change
ends up in cciss_sysfs_pathinfo() rather than scsi_sysfs_pathinfo():
Hunk #1 succeeded at 783 (offset -312
Oops, please use this version (-v2).
When the forwarded patch is applied in the source package, the change
ends up in cciss_sysfs_pathinfo() rather than scsi_sysfs_pathinfo():
Hunk #1 succeeded at 783 (offset -312 lines).
This version has the change in the right place, plus quilt refresh.
Package: src:multipath-tools
Version: 0.5.0-6
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Forwarded: https://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2015-April/msg00049.html
Hi Ritesh,
I noticed some IPR controllers with multipath support may have only
spaces in the rev sysfs attribute, which breaks a device's
On 04/11/2015 01:00 PM, Mauricio Faria de Oliveira wrote:
Tags: patch
It helps to attach the patch :)
--
Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
IBM Linux Technology Center
diff -Nru multipath-tools-0.5.0/debian/changelog
multipath-tools-0.5.0/debian/changelog
--- multipath-tools-0.5.0/debian/changelog
14 matches
Mail list logo
