Hello intrigeri,
intrigeri [2015-05-01 12:34 +0200]:
I see the initscript's start action uses load_configured_profiles,
that in turn uses foreach_configured_profile, that itself uses xargs,
that lives in /usr/bin.
Nicely spotted!
I don't understand how this can work without /usr. Did I miss
Hi Martin,
Martin Pitt wrote (03 May 2015 08:36:40 GMT) :
Could we change the scripts to drop xargs? I. e replace constructions
like cmd1 | xargs -n1 cmd2 with for i in `cmd1`; do cmd2 $i; done,
or cmd1 | xargs cmd2 with cmd2 `cmd1`?
I see xargs used for a few different purposes in
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo
Hi Martin,
I've merged current Ubuntu's packaging branch into
collab-maint/apparmor-experimental, so this is pending for the next
upload to experimental. However:
Martin Pitt wrote (16 Apr 2015 12:56:55 GMT) :
IMHO $local_fs should suffice as during booting the
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 6:22 AM, Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org wrote:
Hi!
While we are that topic, I think it would be better to not pull apparmor
specifics into ifup@.service and networking.service, but rather have
apparmor ship a native .service file and specify the correct orderings,
Hello,
Am Donnerstag, 16. April 2015 schrieb Michael Biebl:
Or maybe better:
provide a native .service file, hook that up in sysinit.target and add
Wants=network-pre.target
Before=network-pre.target
to apparmor.service. See man systemd.special
FYI: I received a service file for openSUSE
On Thu, 16 Apr 2015 19:25:13 +0200 Christian Boltz
apparmor-deb...@cboltz.de wrote:
Hello,
Am Donnerstag, 16. April 2015 schrieb Michael Biebl:
Or maybe better:
provide a native .service file, hook that up in sysinit.target and add
Wants=network-pre.target
Before=network-pre.target
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 5:56 AM, Martin Pitt mp...@debian.org wrote:
Package: apparmor
Version: 2.9.0-3
Hello,
apparmor's init.d script currently depends on $remote_fs. This is a
rather heavy dependency and means that important processes like
dhclient or NFS cannot be covered by apparmor
Hello Cameron,
Cameron Norman [2015-04-16 16:05 -0700]:
I feel like it would be better to split out the click stuff. While it
may be ok to ignore the click bits needing the full fs to be mounted
in most cases, it would ensure that any future issues are properly
avoided. Any objection to it
8 matches
Mail list logo