On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 17:04 +, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> On 27 October 2015 at 15:42, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 18:30 +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> > > 27.10.2015 18:23, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 10:25 +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> > > > > I
On Tue, 27 Oct 2015 17:04:43 + Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
[...]
> I have outstanding patches to upload. And Michael previously asked me
> to continue mdadm maintenance.
That's really good news, Dimitri!
Thanks a lot for stepping in, it's definitely appreciated.
I think you should upload a ve
On 27 October 2015 at 15:42, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 18:30 +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>> 27.10.2015 18:23, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 10:25 +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>> > > I'm not maintaining mdadm anymore.
>> >
>> > Then why have you not orphaned
On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 18:30 +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> 27.10.2015 18:23, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 10:25 +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> > > I'm not maintaining mdadm anymore.
> >
> > Then why have you not orphaned it?
>
> It is team-maintained (or was),
I don't see any
27.10.2015 18:23, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 10:25 +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>> I'm not maintaining mdadm anymore.
>
> Then why have you not orphaned it?
It is team-maintained (or was), and orphaning it means uploading
it which means I'll have to ask the d-i team again. I d
On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 10:25 +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote:
[...]
> I'm not maintaining mdadm anymore.
[...]
Then why have you not orphaned it?
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Never attribute to conspiracy what can adequately be explained by stupidity.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signe
OK, considering only the technical aspects of this bug (not that the other
aspects are not important but I don't want to take position on these), I'm
ready to prepare a NMU. Before doing so, I'd like everyone's point of view
on the solution I proposed as it introduces a regression for slow to
a
27.10.2015 02:27, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Oct 2015 00:01:18 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
>
> [...]
>> Michael, I am not sure I understand what happened: I don't see any
>> recent NMUs for package mdadm, hence I cannot see how d-i developers
>> could "throw your work away".
>>
>> Anyway, t
On Tue, 6 Oct 2015 00:01:18 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> Michael, I am not sure I understand what happened: I don't see any
> recent NMUs for package mdadm, hence I cannot see how d-i developers
> could "throw your work away".
>
> Anyway, the last resort strategy to address your disagreeme
On Sun, 04 Oct 2015 09:52:53 +0200 Paul Muster wrote:
> Dear Michael,
>
> thanks for clarifying the situation.
Dear Michael,
first of all, I would like to join Paul in thanking you for your
helpful explanations.
I am too experiencing this same issue (bug #784070): after unplugging
one drive (in
Dear Michael,
thanks for clarifying the situation.
> serverfault solution isn't exactly wrong, it is incomplete, it
> does not cover a situation when you have slow-to-appear devices.
> This solution, however, fixes the problem in this bugreport,
> a problem which I introduced when I tried to addr
03.10.2015 18:32, jolly eissucht пишет:
> Dear /mjt,
>
> I refer to your messages. Thank you very much for explaining and
> answering to this bug report!
>
> I got the following questions:
>
> 1) What would you suggest as correct workaround for this problem? (as
> you only point out that serverf
Dear /mjt,
I refer to your messages. Thank you very much for explaining and
answering to this bug report!
I got the following questions:
1) What would you suggest as correct workaround for this problem? (as
you only point out that serverfault solution is wrong. I mean
workarounds that are applic
13 matches
Mail list logo
