Hello Andreas,
On 11/12/2016 05:25 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I'd prefer to skip this test anyway (or let the test suite pass even
> if it fails.
I looked into the source, and I guess excluding the test from the set is
the easiest and most straightforward way to achive the effect.
> Sure. If
If I'm not mistaken you are using qt. In that case check that tests are
using qFuzzyCompare. There are also some other macros that help with
dealing with this kind of issues, they are explained in the same doc as
qFuzzyCompare.
--
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
http://perezmeyer.com.ar/
On 11/11/2016 02:29 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Start 197: AmberFF_test
> 197/334 Test #197: AmberFF_test .***Failed
> 0.19 sec
> (...)
> (line 511 TEST_REAL_EQUAL(r4_r1 - r4_i, r1_r4 - r1_i): got -145.471,
> expected -103.957) -
> (line 513
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 01:06:49PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > For now, I have backported the fixes to the released, but Qt4-based
> > 1.4.3~beta1 version, to resolve the current FTBFS with a targeted fix.
> > The changes are uploaded to the debian-med/ball repository on alioth,
> > pending
4 matches
Mail list logo
