Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: jenkins
I'd expect that setting DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck on a package build
should not change the resulting binary packages. It might make the build
succeed despite being broken, but if it succeeds without
Hi Helmut,
> I'd expect that setting DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck on a package build
> should not change the resulting binary packages. It might make the build
> succeed despite being broken, but if it succeeds without nocheck, it
> should be no different when enabled.
Policy is, however, silent on
Hi!
On Sun, 2015-05-24 at 11:42:31 +1000, Stuart Prescott wrote:
> > I'd expect that setting DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck on a package build
> > should not change the resulting binary packages. It might make the build
> > succeed despite being broken, but if it succeeds without nocheck, it
> > should
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 11:42:31AM +1000, Stuart Prescott wrote:
> Policy is, however, silent on whether that is the correct behaviour or not.
> Clarifying policy as to what the correct behaviour should be seems to be a
> necessary first step. I would expect that policy would end up saying
> som
Hi Guillem,
> > > I'd expect that setting DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck on a package build
> > > should not change the resulting binary packages. It might make the build
> > > succeed despite being broken, but if it succeeds without nocheck, it
> > > should be no different when enabled.
> >
> > Polic
Hi,
On Sonntag, 24. Mai 2015, Stuart Prescott wrote:
> > The check does not impose anything on package maintainers, like
> > migration blocking or similar. So even if there was a substantial
> > amount of packages that would fail that test, it would still be useful
> > information for the reproduc
Some elements of this issue have changed in the last couple years, so
following up with a few updated points below...
On 2015-05-24, Stuart Prescott wrote:
>> > > I'd expect that setting DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck on a package build
>> > > should not change the resulting binary packages. It might m
7 matches
Mail list logo