Control: tags -1 + pending
On Wed, 2015-05-27 at 21:12 +0200, Peter Spiess-Knafl wrote:
> On 05/26/2015 11:40 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> >
> > If you're repacking the source, then the version should indicate that -
> > something like 0.9.9+dfsg2-6.1+deb8u1 - better ideas from others
> > welcome
On 05/26/2015 11:40 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>
> If you're repacking the source, then the version should indicate that -
> something like 0.9.9+dfsg2-6.1+deb8u1 - better ideas from others
> welcome. :-)
>
Uploaded under the suggested version.
Thank you for reviewing.
Greetings
Peter
--
To
Hi!
On 05/26/2015 07:27 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Feel free to send a new diff for consideration, yes. (Bearing in mind
> that the window for 8.1 closes over the coming weekend.)
Diff is attached. If you are ok with it, I will upload tomorrow.
>
> #786907 should be marked as fixed in whichev
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Tue, 2015-05-26 at 23:21 +0200, Peter Spiess-Knafl wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On 05/26/2015 07:27 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Feel free to send a new diff for consideration, yes. (Bearing in mind
> > that the window for 8.1 closes over the coming weekend.)
>
> Diff is at
On 2015-05-26 16:50, Peter Spiess-Knafl wrote:
One more thing. I recently adopted the package and found out that it
contains possible unfree (ISC licensed) code (common/sha1.*).
There is also a patch availble in sid for that. Would it be ok to also
include this one? It would require to create a
I raised a bug about this:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=786907
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
One more thing. I recently adopted the package and found out that it
contains possible unfree (ISC licensed) code (common/sha1.*).
There is also a patch availble in sid for that. Would it be ok to also
include this one? It would require to create a new .orig.tar.gz because
it contains the common/s
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo +confirmed
On 2015-05-26 0:29, Peter Spiess-Knafl wrote:
On 05/25/2015 07:47 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Please attach the full source debdiff for a package prepared and
tested on jessie.
Debdiff is attached.
Thanks.
+libvncserver (0.9.9+dfsg-6.2) stable; urgency
On 05/25/2015 07:47 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Please attach the full source debdiff for a package prepared and
> tested on jessie.
Debdiff is attached.
> The meta-data for that bug claims that the bug still affects unstable.
> Given that it appears to be fixed in the package you uploaded yest
Control: tags -1 = jessie moreinfo
On Mon, 2015-05-25 at 10:12 +0200, Peter Spiess-Knafl wrote:
> The current version of libvncserver in stable has an annoying bug [1], which
> is
> already fixed upstream and in sid.
>
> I think it would be very useful to have it also fixed in stable.
>
> The f
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Dear release team!
The current version of libvncserver in stable has an annoying bug [1], which is
already fixed upstream and in sid.
I think it would be very useful to have it also
11 matches
Mail list logo
