Bug#786836: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#786836: packaging not yet ready for mass/stable usage

2015-12-10 Thread Luca Bruno
On Thursday 10 December 2015 10:58:28 Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > >> Even though Rust recently reached the 1.0 milestone, compiler and > >> ecosystem packaging still has to reach a "ready for the masses" > >> status. > > > > What needs to happen to resolve this bug? > > Myself, I am happy to let

Bug#786836: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#786836: packaging not yet ready for mass/stable usage

2015-12-10 Thread Ralph Giles
On 2015-12-10 12:19 PM, Luca Bruno wrote: > We had an informal discussion on IRC a bunch of days ago, and we > now feel confident enough to let rustc+cargo into testing. rustc > 1.5.0 has been tagged today, and together with cargo 0.6.0 we plan > to let them migrate to testing. Thanks Luca

Bug#786836: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#786836: packaging not yet ready for mass/stable usage

2015-12-10 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
Le 10/12/2015 12:19, Luca Bruno a écrit : > On Thursday 10 December 2015 10:58:28 Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > Even though Rust recently reached the 1.0 milestone, compiler and ecosystem packaging still has to reach a "ready for the masses" status. >>> What needs to happen to resolve

Bug#786836: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#786836: packaging not yet ready for mass/stable usage

2015-12-10 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
Hello Ralph, Le 10/12/2015 10:51, Ralph Giles a écrit : > On Tue, 26 May 2015 00:15:50 +0200 Luca Bruno wrote: > >> Even though Rust recently reached the 1.0 milestone, compiler and >> ecosystem packaging still has to reach a "ready for the masses" >> status. > What needs to

Bug#786836: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#786836: packaging not yet ready for mass/stable usage

2015-12-10 Thread Ralph Giles
On 2015-12-10 10:58 AM, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > I will be at the meeting [1] in 30 minutes :p , we can discuss about > that if you want :) I'll be there too, but there may not be time after gecko requirements for rust and rust requirements for the gecko build system and... But we should talk