Bug#787666: multipath-tools: discussion about devname of mpath[0-9]+ vs. mpath[a-z]+

2015-06-09 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
On Thursday 04 June 2015 03:36 AM, Mauricio Faria de Oliveira wrote: Hi Ritesh, Regarding the option for Debian to stay on devnames like mpath[0-9]+ rather than that adopted upstream, mpath[a-z]+ (patch 0002).. Do you mind explaining to me if there's any particular reasons for that? Or how

Bug#787666: multipath-tools: discussion about devname of mpath[0-9]+ vs. mpath[a-z]+

2015-06-09 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Control: notfound -1 multipath-tools/0.5.0-7 Control: found -1 multipath-tools/0.4.9-3 Control: fixed -1 multipath-tools/0.4.9+git0.4dfdaf2b-1 Control: close -1 Ritesh, On 06/09/2015 07:41 AM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: Regarding the option for Debian to stay on devnames like mpath[0-9]+ rather

Bug#787666: multipath-tools: discussion about devname of mpath[0-9]+ vs. mpath[a-z]+

2015-06-03 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Package: src:multipath-tools Version: 0.5.0-7 Severity: wishlist Hi Ritesh, Regarding the option for Debian to stay on devnames like mpath[0-9]+ rather than that adopted upstream, mpath[a-z]+ (patch 0002).. Do you mind explaining to me if there's any particular reasons for that? Or how