eric2.vale...@orange.com [2015-06-16 13:18 +0200]:
> This has been fixed for apparmor, why not for seccomp?
I filed a bug about it and pinged the maintainer; I don't see a reason
why it shouldn't get fixed.
> Can't you add a test at build time that checks that systemd does not depend
> on /usr/li
On 06/16/2015 01:30 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
Am 16.06.2015 um 13:18 schrieb eric2.vale...@orange.com:
On 06/16/2015 11:58 AM, Michael Biebl wrote:
My suggestion would be, to fix your setup to either use an initramfs
like initramfs-tools or dracut, which mounts your /usr partition, or
use no sep
Am 16.06.2015 um 13:18 schrieb eric2.vale...@orange.com:
> On 06/16/2015 11:58 AM, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> My suggestion would be, to fix your setup to either use an initramfs
>> like initramfs-tools or dracut, which mounts your /usr partition, or
>> use no separate /usr partition at all. There i
On 06/16/2015 11:58 AM, Michael Biebl wrote:
My suggestion would be, to fix your setup to either use an initramfs
like initramfs-tools or dracut, which mounts your /usr partition, or
use no separate /usr partition at all. There is just to much stuff
that is (silently) broken by this.
I just ha
[please don't use HTML only mails, or better no HTML at all]
Am 16.06.2015 um 11:46 schrieb eric2.vale...@orange.com:
> On 06/16/2015 11:40 AM, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> Am 16.06.2015 um 10:42 schrieberic2.vale...@orange.com:
>>> On 06/16/2015 10:17 AM, Michael Biebl wrote:
Separate /usr and no
On 06/16/2015 11:40 AM, Michael Biebl
wrote:
Am 16.06.2015 um 10:42 schrieb eric2.vale...@orange.com:
On 06/16/2015 10:17 AM, Michael Biebl wrote:
Separate /usr and no initramfs to mount it?
yes but 220-5 was w
Am 16.06.2015 um 10:42 schrieb eric2.vale...@orange.com:
>
> On 06/16/2015 10:17 AM, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> Separate /usr and no initramfs to mount it?
>
> yes but 220-5 was working. I rather suspect the /tmp change as I do have
> this line in my /etc/fstab
Nope, it's more likely this:
* Ena
On 06/16/2015 10:20 AM, VALETTE Eric OLNC/OLPS wrote:
On 06/16/2015 10:17 AM, Michael Biebl wrote:
Separate /usr and no initramfs to mount it?
yes but 220-5 was working. I rather suspect the /tmp change as I do
have this line in my /etc/fstab
LABEL=TMP /tmp ext2defaults
On 06/16/2015 10:17 AM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Separate /usr and no initramfs to mount it?
yes but 220-5 was working. I rather suspect the /tmp change as I do have
this line in my /etc/fstab
LABEL=TMP /tmp ext2defaults0 2
-- eric
Separate /usr and no initramfs to mount it?
Am 16. Juni 2015 10:06:07 MESZ, schrieb Eric Valette :
>Package: systemd
>Version: 220-6
>Severity: critical
>Justification: breaks the whole system
>
>After yesterday upgrade to systemd 220.6, my system no longer boot. It
>reports a kernel panic witha
Package: systemd
Version: 220-6
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
After yesterday upgrade to systemd 220.6, my system no longer boot. It reports
a kernel panic witha attempting to kill init. I guess a kind of fault occurs in
the daemon but I cannot easilly find traces.
--
11 matches
Mail list logo