Le 18/06/2015 18:39, Dominique Dumont a écrit :
I need an example to create the test case. Could you attach one to this bug
report ? (no need of a complete file, just the header)
All the best
Sure! Here we go (from qtmultimedia-opensource-src):
/*
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 3:00 AM, Dominique Dumont wrote:
> On Wednesday 17 June 2015 16:58:40 Didier Roche wrote:
>> If we revert that one, with devscript 2.15.5, I can get the digia
>> copyright back:
>>[Copyright: 2014 Digia Plc and/or its subsidiary(-ies)]
>>
>> I'm unsure about that change
On Wednesday 17 June 2015 16:58:40 Didier Roche wrote:
> I guess we can introduce one test for that use case.
I need an example to create the test case. Could you attach one to this bug
report ? (no need of a complete file, just the header)
All the best
--
https://github.com/dod38fr/ -o- ht
On Wednesday 17 June 2015 16:58:40 Didier Roche wrote:
> If we revert that one, with devscript 2.15.5, I can get the digia
> copyright back:
>[Copyright: 2014 Digia Plc and/or its subsidiary(-ies)]
>
> I'm unsure about that change (and the other optimizations related into
> that commit), so
Package: devscripts
Version: 2.15.5
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
Since 2.15.5, licensecheck --copyright doesn't report copyrigthed file
including
/.
Most of Qt packages (and files generated through Qt tools) contains:
Copyright (C) 2013 Digia Plc and/or its subsidiary(-ies).
Which is
5 matches
Mail list logo
